groundviews is a Sri Lankan citizen journalism initiativeregister here.login.find out more
inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Self Colonising …

Recently, I noticed an Q&A style article titled “India Is Colonising Itself” by Arundhati Roy and Shoma Chaudhuri.

I thought the first Q and A was very interesting, and perhaps parts of it are applicable to Sri Lanka. So, I have cut and pasted it below, and look forward to any comments about “we’ve begun to eat our own limbs”, or anything else that might grab you!

There is an atmosphere of growing violence across the country. How do you read the signs? Do you think it will grow more in the days to come? What are its causes? In what context should all this be read?

You don’t have to be a genius to read the signs. We have a growing middle class, being reared on a diet of radical consumerism and aggressive greed. Unlike industrializing western countries which had colonies from which to plunder resources and generate slave labour to feed this process, we have to colonize ourselves, our own nether parts. We’ve begun to eat our own limbs. The greed that is being generated (and marketed as a value interchangeable with nationalism) can only be sated by grabbing land, water and resources from the vulnerable. What we’re witnessing is the most successful secessionist struggle ever waged in Independent India. The secession of the middle and upper classes from the rest of the country. It’s a vertical secession, not a lateral one. They’re fighting for the right to merge with the world’s elite somewhere up there in the stratosphere. They’ve managed to commandeer the resources , the coal, the minerals, the bauxite, the water and electricity. Now they want the land to make more cars, more bombs, more mines – super toys for the new super citizens of the new superpower. So it’s outright war, and people on both sides are choosing their weapons. The government and the corporations reach for Structural Adjustment, the World Bank, the ADB, FDI, friendly court orders, friendly policy makers, help from the ‘friendly’ corporate media and a police force that will ram all this down peoples’ throats. Those who want to resist this process have, until now, reached for dharnas, hunger-strikes, satyagraha, the courts, and what they thought was friendly media. But now, more and more are reaching for guns. Will the violence grow? If the ‘growth rate’ and the sensex are going to be the only barometres the government uses to measure progress and the well-being of people, then of course it will. How do I read the signs? It isn’t hard to read sky-writing. What it says up there, in big letters is this: The shit has hit the fan, folks.


496 have read this this article so far. You may also find these articles interesting:
  • An encounter in Puttlam: Peace as seen by two youth who served in the Army My article is based on an encounter with two Sinhalese youth in Puttlam recently. Both had served in the Army. Both had lost limbs, though we didn’t find this out till much later. We listened silently as we sat on the bund and they recounted their stories of war, and their aspirations for peace. When so... rasika, May 25, 2007
  • Rohan Edrisinha on the APRC Proposals and the 13th Amendment to the Constitution Rohan Edrisinha, Senior Lecturer of the University of Colombo and the Head of the Legal Unit CPA, talks in detail about and through three key points, critiques the flaccid proposals submitted recently to the President by the APRC. Also read APRC: The Year of the Rat has begun. addthis_url = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.groundviews.org%2F2007%2F04%2F11%2Fself-colonising%2F'; ... groundviews, January 30, 2008

| Share this article on Facebook

sushil_yadav said,

April 11, 2007 @ 12:27 pm

Sam,

In response to your post “self Colonising” on Consumerism, Exploitation of Natural Resources, Violence and Environmental Crisis I want to post a part from my article which examines the impact of Speed, Overstimulation, Consumerism and Industrialization on our minds and environment. Please read.

The link between Mind and Social / Environmental-Issues.

The fast-paced, consumerist lifestyle of Industrial Society is causing exponential rise in psychological problems besides destroying the environment. All issues are interlinked. Our Minds cannot be peaceful when attention-spans are down to nanoseconds, microseconds and milliseconds. Our Minds cannot be peaceful if we destroy Nature.

Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment.

Subject : In a fast society slow emotions become extinct.
Subject : A thinking mind cannot feel.
Subject : Scientific/ Industrial/ Financial thinking destroys the planet.

Emotion is what we experience during gaps in our thinking.

If there are no gaps there is no emotion.

Today people are thinking all the time and are mistaking thought (words/ language) for emotion.

When society switches-over from physical work (agriculture) to mental work (scientific/ industrial/ financial/ fast visuals/ fast words ) the speed of thinking keeps on accelerating and the gaps between thinking go on decreasing.

There comes a time when there are almost no gaps.

People become incapable of experiencing/ tolerating gaps.

Emotion ends.

Man becomes machine.

A society that speeds up mentally experiences every mental slowing-down as Depression / Anxiety.

A ( travelling )society that speeds up physically experiences every physical slowing-down as Depression / Anxiety.

A society that entertains itself daily experiences every non-entertaining moment as Depression / Anxiety.

Fast visuals/ words make slow emotions extinct.

Scientific/ Industrial/ Financial thinking destroys emotional circuits.

A fast (large) society cannot feel pain / remorse / empathy.

A fast (large) society will always be cruel to Animals/ Trees/ Air/ Water/ Land and to Itself.

To read the complete article please follow any of these links :

PlanetSave

FreeInfoSociety

ePhilosopher

sushil_yadav

Jack Point said,

April 11, 2007 @ 1:59 pm

What would be miss Roy’s ideal land, where things remain stable and there is no grabbing of resources from the vulnerable?

Is she advocating that India go back to the half century of stagnation that it experienced between 1947 and 1990? How many Indians would want that?

Perhaps, she prefers Burma, where things have been unchanging for many decades?

Or perhaps, the idealised Victorian society or the 1930’s that many seem to be hankering after?

The Mahinda Chinthanaya does seem to fall in line with some, if not all of Roy’s thinking, maybe all that is needed is the implementation of that.

Jeyanthy said,

April 11, 2007 @ 3:27 pm

Jack Point’s comments seems to assume that there are only two options- remain the same, without change and stagnate or change for the worse (a dichotomy between “going back to half century of stagnation” to “grabbing resources from the vulnerable” as the only option seems to be a false dichotomy to me). Yes, change is inevitable and necessary. But what kind of change ? That, it seems to me, is something we can have some impact on… as a society, as concerned individuals who care about our fellow human beings and our environment… after all, the decisions that lead to the “grabbing of resources’ from the vulnerable are made by human beings (yes, the “middle and upper classes” are made up of human beings… many of them/us very kind, caring human beings… who are not necessarily aware that their/our life style is dependent on exploitation and harm to others and if/when they/we realize that, many of them/us would be horrified… and yes, unfortunately, others of us will want to hide from knowing this fact since it would be too painful to admit to themselves/ourselves and it would seem so difficult to change their/our live styles… But of course, these are all choices we/they make and some of these are things we/they can change at individual levels and others are choices we/they need to make at societal level.

I would like to believe we human beings who have invented such beauty in art, creativity in technology, inventiveness in so many ways have the capacity (if only we took the trouble to look for it) to come with ways to improve the standard of living for ALL people and care for the environment at the same time… and NOT have to settle for oppression as a fact of life. Because it doesn’t have to be… in fact, as long as it is, we all suffer and we don’t’ need to…

Jack Point said,

April 12, 2007 @ 9:57 am

It is very easy to criticize, a lot harder to come up with solutions.

My question to Ray would be, if you are not happy with the status quo, come up with a framework that you think suitable and then we can debate.

SInce Roy is not involved in the discussion here, perhaps someone else could come up with something.

My own simplified solution for SL would be a combination of consitutiona;l reform (to eliminate the corruption enshrined in the present constitution and restoring the accountability of government & a market economy. My model would be Singapore.

To elaborate a bit:

1. Constitutional reform, a resturn to Westminster type constitution, with a first past the post (not proportional representation) to decide the winner. The preferential voting system also goes out.
2. The above needs to be allied with spending limits on election campaigns and transparency in fund raising.

This would address the problems of (1) an over-powerful president/executive (2) restore the independence of the judiciary & legislature. This will bring about greater accountability of the executive (essentially the cabinet & the prime minister) Remember that under the Westminister constitution, a Cabinet Minister becomes a part of the executive and can no longer vote with the House (the legislature) to approve bills.

The elimination of the proportionla represntation provides clear winners and enables a government to form a working majority. This eliminates the horse trading allied with bribery (join us for XXX rewards) that the house focuses on real issues instead of eternal machinations to get majorities.

The elimination of the preferential voting system will reduce the amount spent on campaigns (at the moment each candidate has to run a campaign AND the party has to run a campaign. Further campaigns have to be run separately for president & parliament)

Spending limits and transparency in fundraising will go a long way to removing the underworld/criminals from politics. AT the moment both parties are funded mainly by the criminal underworld, who also supply the manpower necessary for electtion campaigns as well as the bodyguards. According to information that I have got, estimates of spending by the UNP on the presidential campaign range from Rs1,000m to Rs,2000m. (Rs.1bn to Rs,2bn) with a similar amount spent by the SLFP. That is US$10m. To put this in context Hillary Clinton has raised only a little more than that in her fundraising efforts. Basically, all funds raised would need to be made public, audited by accountants and available for scrutuny by the public, opposition parties and the Inland Revenue.

There is no way that corporates, donations from the public and member subscriptions can raise that kind of money. The only source of that has thsi type of funding and the willingness to spend (because they are in fact buying political influence - or freedom to conduct their illegal activities) are the organised ciminals.

Who are the associates of politicos? Just read the newspapers. Who is Mervin Silva associated with? Who Bookiepala associated with? VAT scam Kathubdeen is reported to have donated heavily. Naturally, the same lot donate to both parties. This is why we have the crime wave that we are experiencing - the big criminals are above the law, the police concentrate on traffic offences and petty crime.

These steps, together with a strengthening of the bribery commissioners office and the independent commissions will go a long way to taking the dirty money out of the system and with it the influence of the criminals.

Jack Point said,

April 12, 2007 @ 10:07 am

I cannot agree with Yadev’s argument that “Industrial Society Destroys Mind and Environment.”

The smallest footprint on nature would be left by a hunter gatherer society, not agricultural societies.

The problem with both of these is that they can only support a limited number of people although agrarian societies can support significantly more people than a hunter/gatherer society. Going back to these forms would necessitate the death of a large chunk of the population.

Mao tried this, in the Great Leap forward. He sent people back into the countryside. An estimted 30m died, mostly from starvation.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

This is a moderated forum. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy.

Please read our full submission guidelines before you comment.

Comments that do not adhere to these guidelines will be edited or deleted and those who repeatedly abuse this forum will be banned. Thanks in advance for your civil and constructive engagement.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free