groundviews is a Sri Lankan citizen journalism initiativeregister here.login.find out more
inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

An inconvenient history: A reply to Victory Ivan’s viewpoints on criminal defamation

වික්ටර් අයිවන්ට පිළිතුරක් : තවත් බොහෝ දේ තිබේ
උවිඳු කුරුකුලසූරිය

“සාපරාධී අපහාස නීතියට එරෙහිව මෙන්ම ජනමාධ්‍ය නිදහස වෙනුවෙන්ද වික්ටර් අයිවන් විශාල වැඩ කොටසක් කර ඇති බව අවිවාදිතය. එහෙත් ඒ සියල්ල තමන් තනිවම කළ ඒවා ලෙස සැලකීම හොඳ නැත. අනෙක් අතට පසුගිය වසර වන තෙක් වික්ටර් අයිවන් නිදහස් මාධ්‍ය ව්‍යාපාරයේ ලේකම්, කැඳවුම්කරු, උපලේකම් ආදී විවිධ තනතුරු දරා ඇත. එමෙන්ම
කර්තෘ සංසදයේද සාමාජිකයෙකු ලෙස කටයුතු කර ඇත. ශී‍්‍ර ලංකා පුවත්පත් ආයතනයේ අධ්‍යක්‍ෂවරයෙකු ලෙස කටයුතු කර ඇත. මාධ්‍ය සංවිධාන යමක් නොකළා යැයි කියමන සත්‍යයක් නම් එයට ඔහුද වගකිව යුතුය.”

My article is a response to Victor Ivan’s recent spate of letters in Ravaya on criminal defamation in Sri Lanka. I suggest to the reader that Mr. Ivan’s submission that he was the sole voice of dissent and protest against criminal defamation charges against media personnel to be untrue. From memory, I list out the many ways in which indvidual journalists, including myself, the Free Media Movement, other journalist organisations and civil society organisations rallied against the use of criminal defamation laws to gag the media. I go on to point out several regrettable lapses of memory and judgement that result in Mr. Ivan claiming ownership over and taking the credit things he in fact cannot.

While acknowledging that Mr. Ivan, perhaps more than any other Editor alive today, has suffered the brunt of criminal defamation mechanisms used against him, I point out that his egregiously partial reading and reportage of events and issues contravenes the professional standards and ethics that Ravaya itself drew up to govern its journalism.

Please read my article in full here.

Also see:
Attempts to reintroduce criminal defamation law
Building a campaign against criminal defamation in your country


1,851 have read this this article so far. You may also find these articles interesting:
  • Victor Ivan: This is your conscience speaking! - An open letter to the Ravaya Editor Photo credit: Tamilnation In my article to Groundviews, I ask what I believe is an extremely pertinent question from my erstwhile colleague, Victor Ivan, the Editor of Ravaya. I ask him to explain his stance regarding the blanket censorship on news and information on “Mawbima” and Managala Samaraweera. My article uses the philosophy of Bertrand Russell, a... groundviews, March 28, 2007
  • The pretense of professionalism - the flipside of media freedom in Sri Lanka In calling the media “feral beasts” caught in a vicious cycle of unravelling standards Tony Blair, in his last days of office, may have captured the approach to journalism by some of the media institutions in Sri Lanka. While a recent article to Groundviews points to the abject degeneracy of State media in Sri... groundviews, July 1, 2007

| Share this article on Facebook

Voice in Colombo said,

July 27, 2007 @ 3:49 pm

I have read Victor’s article, and listen to his views about criminal defamation law, on radio and TV. I personally believe he (Victor Ivan) got a more realistic and impartial point of view regarding the matter, compared to the POV’s of most restless journalists we have in Sri Lanka these days. Victor clearly stand agains the criminal defamation law, and he doesn’t want it back. And I don’t think he said anywhere that, he was the “sole owner” of the credit of getting rid of criminal defamation law. At the same time he accept that the journalists them selves have a large part of responsibility for the government’s latest decision of re-considering this law. According to him, ever since this law was dumped, the professionalism and social responsibility of our journalists are deteriorating. He urged, the journalists not to misuse the victories achieved by journalists in press freedom, as a collective effort. As I can see, Victor Ivan is a more seasoned journalist, who believe in a press freedom with limit. The limit is the line between truth and misinformation. I think many other “gray haired” journalists should use their experiences, and try to understand the reality.

uvindu said,

July 30, 2007 @ 2:51 pm

“voice in colombo” claimed that he had read Victor’s articles, and said victor never claimed “sole owner” of the credit of getting rid of criminal defamation law. if you read Victor’s articles on 15th and 22nd of july Ravaya you can see Victor’s claim

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

This is a moderated forum. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy.

Please read our full submission guidelines before you comment.

Comments that do not adhere to these guidelines will be edited or deleted and those who repeatedly abuse this forum will be banned. Thanks in advance for your civil and constructive engagement.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free