groundviews is a Sri Lankan citizen journalism initiativeregister here.login.find out more
inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Killing dissent: Lasantha, violence and impunity

In a country where, it seems, shooting the messenger has become the norm, yet another journalist who sought to highlight everything that is wrong with Sri Lanka today, has been brutally gunned down.

Lasantha Wickramatunge is the latest victim of a long list of assassinations of media personnel in Sri Lanka, yet another sorry statistic which has made Sri Lanka one of the most dangerous countries for journalists to practice their profession, according to Reporters without Borders.

My obvious political differences with Lasantha do not prevent me from appreciating his personal, political and journalistic qualities as a leader in the island’s media industry. He was fearless and was willing to boldly uncover and critically expose in no uncertain terms what he believed to be the truth. His assassination is a tragic loss to the people of Sri Lanka as a whole. I take this occasion to convey my deepest sympathies to his family, friends and colleagues.

In the outstanding contribution he has made to Sri Lankan journalism over a comparatively short but eventful life, Lasantha took governments of all hues to task through his daring and unparalleled investigative reporting. He was a strong critic of the current government. He wrote recently about the war euphoria enveloping the country and warned of the danger of not addressing the aspirations of the Tamil people. Despite many attempts to silence him, he continued exposing what he believed to be misconduct and corruption by highly influential individuals. He did not allow his freedom to write to be limited by the ‘truths’ presented to the people.

The Government of Sri Lanka and the President have condemned this tragic murder in public and ordered an investigation. In the past few years there have been many similarly heinous assassinations carried out in Sri Lanka. Many parties and individuals including some who hold high positions have been blamed for these killings. In every such assassination, the government ordered investigations. However, very few perpetrators of such terrorist activities were ever brought to justice. When allegations were raised against those who were not in government, the process had been fairly swift, while when allegations were raised against those who were in government, the process had been extremely slow.

The government claims that investigations cannot proceed due to lack of witnesses; that those who have witnessed such assassinations have not come forward to provide any evidence. In the north and east the reason for this seems fairly obvious. Either, people did not know, or were too afraid to antagonize the various forces affiliated to the parties involved in the situation there. This situation extended to Anuradhapura and what happened afterwards is public knowledge which does not need to reiterate here. Setting fire to ‘Sirasa’ broadcasting station and assassinating Mr Lasantha Wickrematunga signifies the return of these terror tactics to the south of the island.

Naturally, questions arise in one’s mind: who are the parties or individuals, people in the south are afraid of accusing when such heinous incidents occur? We remember the historical parallels that existed in the 1988-89 period where various pro-government paramilitary groups and the notorious “Deshapremi Janatha Vyaparaya” silenced people.

Who were these groups? Who led them? Are many of those ring-leaders still in positions of power now?

The long list of assassination of media personnel include RK Ratnasingam in 1985, M. Amirthalingam and I. Shanmugalingam in 1986, Nithyananthan in 1987, Rajani Thiranagama and K. S. Rajah in 1989, Richard de Zoysa in 1990, Rohana Kumara and Nadarajah Atputharajah in 1999, Mylvaganam Nimalarajan in 2000, Aiyathurai Nadesan and Balanadarajah Iyer in 2004, Dharmaretnam (Taraki) Sivaram, Arasakumar Kannamuthu, Relangi Selvarajah, Manickam Kamalanathan and Yogakumar Krishnapillai in 2005, Subramaniam Sugirtharajan, Bastian George Sagayathas, S. Ranjith, Suresh Kumar, Rajiv Kumar, Sampath Lakmal de Silva, Mariathas Manojanraj, Sathasivam Baskaran and Sinnathamby Sivamaharajah  in 2006, S. T. Gananathan, Chandrabose Suthaharan, Selvarajah Rajivaram and Sahathevan Deluxshan in 2007, and P. Devakumaran, Mahendran Varadhan, and Rashmi Mohamed in 2008.

Obviously, all parties to the conflict in Sri Lanka have targeted media personnel.

Time and again, local and international organisations have called upon these parties to respect the rights of media personnel to report and inform on the happenings in the country.  

Governments of the time have been called upon to investigate all cases of attacks, disappearances and killings promptly, independently, impartially and effectively, irrespective of the identity of perpetrators or victims. Yet, despite pious pronouncements about democratic ideals and rights of free speech, these killers have been brought to justice only rarely.

Many journalists have fled their work areas and what is called news reporting in Sri Lanka today seems entirely dependent on what is dictated by the ruling faction.  

These assassinations and the repressive culture being imposed upon the Sri Lankan society, culminating with the killing of Mr Wickramatunga, should provide the impetus to stimulate all political forces and individuals in Sri Lanka and overseas, who are committed to protecting the human and democratic rights of its people, to come together and oppose this state of  fascism.

For the people of Sri Lanka, this latest assassination should serve as a timely reminder  of the immortal poem by Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892-1984) on the inactivity of German intellectuals following the ascendency of Nazis to power and the targeting of people who did not adhere to their twisted philosophy;

When the Nazis came for the communists,
I remained silent;
I was not a communist.
When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.
When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.
When they came for the Jews,
I remained silent;
I was not a Jew.
When they came for me,
there was no one left to speak out.

It is the duty of every Sri Lankan, local and overseas to ensure that this does not happen.

Print this post
1,198 have read this this article so far. You may also find these articles interesting:
  • One year later: A murder unresolved, a government unashamed Maybe we are numb too Though it’s warm and all we have today Is a cloudy sky Death at Noon, Vivimarie Vanderpoorten Lasantha Wickremetunge, the Editor of the Sunday Leader and one of Sri Lanka’s best known and most senior journalists, was killed in broad daylight one year ago. As we noted on the site a year ago, Lasantha was 50... Groundviews, January 8, 2010
  • On Lasantha Wickremetunge, media freedom and human rights in Sri Lanka: Interview with Dilrukshi Handunnetti “Governments usually don’t take notice of silent majorities” says well known investigative and environmental journalism Dilrukshi Handunnetti in this video interview with Groundviews. To commemorate Human Rights Day 2009 (falling on 10 December) Groundviews interviewed a number of leading activists in Sri Lanka to find out their perspectives on current challenges facing human rights in post-war... Groundviews, December 18, 2009

| Share this article on Facebook

danton said,

January 12, 2009 @ 11:47 am

Rajapakse's are drunk with power. High time Human rights movement speck to them or force them to speck., And think of giving Sri Lankans a chance to live.

Dayan Jayatilleka said,

January 13, 2009 @ 2:44 am

Does no one out there on groundviews remember the lethal grenade attack on the Shah Rukh Khan show — for which no one was arrested? Does no one remember the communication claiming credit for the murder of Sivaram; a communication claiming to be from a vigilante group bearing the name of a martial figure from ancient history? Please also remember that none of those top figures, civilian and otherwise, accused by gv readers and "civil society" of Lasantha's killing, were in the picture at the time. Do not confuse a cancer in the gut for a tumour in the brain of the body politic. Wrong diagnosis helps no one.

Lionel Bopage said,

January 16, 2009 @ 1:40 am

Ambassador Dr Dayan Jayatilleka in his comment raises several points to reflect upon.

However, my statement was intended to highlight the increasingly intolerant regimes to which all Sri Lankans seem to have been subject to; where harassment and assassinations of journalists who do not adhere to the ruling elite’s dictates seem to have become the norm.

To use Dr Jayatilleka’s own colourful phrase of “not confusing a cancer in the gut for a tumour in the brain”, what I was highlighting was the fact that an environment has been created where both cancers and tumours seem to be thriving in Sri Lanka.

That if Sri Lanka’s ruling elite ignores or encourages the current state of anarchy and lawlessness, either directly or indirectly, the probability of many more cancers and tumours erupting everywhere cannot be ruled out.

This unequivocally points to the fact that it is extremely important to replace the barren ground of injustice, discrimination and inequity with a fertile field where the diverse people of Sri Lanka can fulfil their aspirations with respect, dignity, fairness, justice, and equity of opportunity within a united country.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

This is a moderated forum. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Please do not post comments that are off topic, defamatory, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Comments are automatically scanned for spam and obscenity.

Comments are only approved if they are in line with the site guidelines. Those that do not will be edited or deleted without prior intimation. Comment approval may take up to 24 hours.

Thanks in advance for your civil and constructive engagement.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free