groundviews is a Sri Lankan citizen journalism initiativeregister here.login.find out more
inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

14 years ago: Memories of the Big Match

14 years ago there was cricket, but no SMS.

The challenge then was to communicate a ball-by-ball account of Royal’s tawdry batting and its inevitable and ignominious defeat to an enthusiastic Thomian old boy network outside the grounds and abroad on the days of the Big Match. Things were simpler then.

A few of us had a bottle of Mendis Arrack stashed in a safe place, ensconced in more newspaper than was necessary (a broken bottle was to be avoided at all costs), and checked up on more frequently than consumed. We were College or House Prefects then, and drinking alcohol in public was to undermine an existing social, political and moral order. We were also young, our live(r)s fresh, our teenage libido priapic at the mere hint of any skin from girls, and for some, boys. Teachers in vain tried to give us oodles of homework, which was faithfully untouched. Their vexation sometimes faked, for they too revelled in the Big Match fever and cared little about formal education.

There were the unmistakable papara bands that sober or legless, played age old tunes with unerring aplomb and vigour. We scaled walls, fell down trees, played with irate authorities, threw water into classrooms, shrieked, screamed, ran, clambered, drank and then ran some more. We were effectively disruptive. It was quasi-primordial. For the casual reader or observer, perhaps even wrong and uncivilised. But for the partaker and participant, this was a time of unbridled fun – most good natured – and part of a longer tradition of schoolboy (and quite often school girl) revelry.

14 years ago, we hadn’t heard of sexual harassment or gender violence. We didn’t know. We didn’t care because 14 years ago, Sri Lanka was a different place. We were happier. Less stressed. Less anxious. Less politically correct. Schools looked like schools. There were no barricades, no army, no armed guards, no Police, no checkpoints. IDs were optional and parents weren’t on edge and on civil defence committees. We could go to Galle Face, sit on grass (there was still grass then) and just be. No questions would be asked. No security forces would be seen. No one would care. We were free and felt free.

Interspersed with cricket, thoughts about love, life and sex dominated our lives at Big Match time. And yet, our identity was anchored to one that was larger – we were Thomians. Never a Sinhala Buddhist Thomian, a Govigama Thomian, an Up-Country Tamil Thomian or a Burgher Minority Thomian. Class was evident in how we came and left College, but repeatedly throughout College, we never failed to cough up fees for the one or two who suddenly could not afford to pay for a term. Of course, being Sinhala Buddhist, I was then largely blind to what was a different reality for Tamils, who were even then much more acutely aware of their identity. Yet, to retrospectively dissect our collegial interactions through the critical lens of experience or the scalpel of anthropology is folly – we were young, and all was well as long as the guiding fiction of a Thomian victory was strong.

I used a cellular phone for the first time 14 years ago. It was a Motorola. Big and heavy, I lugged it to the scoreboard and relayed information back to a friend in College in charge of uploading it to the web. It was the most sophisticated piece of technology at the Big Match and weighed close to a kilo. Each call cost over ten to fifteen times more than what one pays today, and there was only one mobile phone service provider. Carrying this car battery size device around, worth over a lakh at the time, require a security detail of slightly drunk prefects surrounding the bearer of the phone. I once happened to be this bearer and am guilty of adding four runs to the Thomian batting when in fact it was just a single run. Perhaps the tipple contributed. Or maybe I was just bored in the prison of the scoreboard. Today, I can get my Big Match updates wherever I am in the world in real time. I can get thousands of photos and videos streamed or downloaded to my mobile. I can eye ball, on demand, a lissom fan as easily as the third umpire can order an obdurate Royalist who refuses to leave the crease. I can now hurl insults to blind umpires on Facebook, join the Captain’s harem on MySpace and become a secret voyeur at the team’s wild post-victory soirée streamed through 3G. 14 years ago, you couldn’t find any technology to switch on. Today, you can’t switch off.

14 years ago there were no cheerleaders who risked great harm to mammaries by wearing loose bras, or none at all, to enhance their visual appeal and augment the sense of movement. We didn’t have sponsored ads blaring out from loudspeakers. Commercial sponsorship was less garish. There was no brand war, no competing mobile phone companies, and no blimps. We were also poorer. Few of us had the essential bling of teenage life today – no iPods, no mobiles. No one, mercifully, wore Crocs. We were happy with lots of coke and a smidgen of arrack. If the match was no particularly in our favour, we were drunk after a quarter, legless after half and senseless as the afternoon progressed with much remaining still in the bottle. We fought ugly fights and have an uncanny ability to remember our opponents and their nicknames. But your author has yet to meet anyone who precisely remembers the bones of contestation. We all agree that the fights then weren’t the result of or based on ethnic or religious fault lines. An empty bottle, a petulant vagina, a sorry arse or a vagrant dick even was oftentimes involved or the cause of conflict – but nothing more. No one had even imagined carrying arms or knives. When the gauntlet was thrown, the fist quickly took over, followed by arms (of the physical, muscular sort), body, bodies of one’s supporters, then their supporters until finally everyone and everything was dust, sweat and madness.

If this description of Big Match carnivalesque smacks of some hedonistic domain that needs to be reviled and rejected, I wonder what the reader thinks of the brutality of war today. Of people forced to reside in tin sheds in the sweltering heat. Of babies killed, dismembered and scarred for life by shelling. Of men, women and children with nothing to look forward to – communities without an iota hope. Where there is no cricket. Where there has never been cricket. No laughter. No music. Nothing. Where’s the cricket in this?

14 years ago, the war against terror was distant reality, at best. In our revelry and our innocence, we lived lives in College and at home anchored to and around a single Big Match each year. Our worst drudgery was exams. Our worst torture, a talented Royalist cricketer (fortunately, this rare animal was endangered even then). More seriously though, our memories of the Big Match still draw us together. It was an uncomplicated chapter in our lives; easy to romanticise and imbue with what was as much as what was not. Mindful today of the violence and uncertainty surrounding us, many of us look at the Big Match with an air of nostalgia and longing, to be on the grounds again, straw hat donned, souvenir in hand and the promise of melted ice, coke and the dregs of Mendis at the end of the day.

14 years hence, times have changed. The Rajapakse regime today is not cricket. It’s spin is inelegant and violent, its score deplorable on many counts. The big match is still escape from all this, but less enjoyable because of it. To see the symbols of violence – yellow barricades, barrels, armed guards, Police jeeps and sniffer dogs – intermingled with the bacchanalia is a strange juxtaposition for us used to a different atmosphere. Perhaps it’s normal for Thomians 14 years younger. Perhaps it’s not even a problem. Perhaps it’s us that’s the problem, hankering after a memory we can never relive. But as the sounds of baila and the Naga Salam caress disused muscles to dance, the crack of a Thomian willow cutting the aroma of a fresh Mendis mingling with the fizz of EGB Ginger Beer mid-day, your author will necessarily forget all that’s wrong with Sri Lanka today.

If only for a few days, when he is a schoolboy again.

[Authors note: I was invited by the Thomian Tent Committee of the 130th Battle of the Blues to contribute an article to the Thomian souvenir back in November 2008. After submitting this piece in February this year, I was told that the Editor had issues with my suggestion that that Rajapakse regime today is not cricket and wanted to change this line to "The regime of today's political wolves is not cricket". This was apparently because the Tent Committee felt that the souvenir should not directly address any particular political party or actor, and that any criticism should be general in nature.

My response was the following:

I wrote that knowing full well that it would be the one sentence that would cause problems, given the President's connections to College. Sadly yet predictably, the Editor has demonstrated a singular lack of courage and a supine subservience to political authority gone amok. I wrote what I meant, and do not find agreeable what the Editor has suggested.

Asanga Welikala and I wrote a joint editorial in 1995 that was the first editorial in the history of the magazine that espoused federalism as the essential foundation of a lasting political settlement to the ethnic conflict. The author's own satirical contributions to the College magazine under the pseudonym Hell's Dire Agent in the mid-90's marked in pointed jest well known contemporaries in the student and staff body. College was the grounding of being purposefully irreverent in thought, writing and action in later years. To this day, I don't believe any other school in Sri Lanka offered the same space for liberal thought and free expression to blossom.

The tragic confusion between Thomian grit and grovel by the Editor of the souvenir demonstrates the pervasive nature of anxiety in Sri Lanka today, an essential cowardice that risks prostituting our guiding motto for 14 years and for some, in adult life - Esto Perpetua.]

Print this post
1,228 have read this this article so far. You may also find these articles interesting:
  • Royal Thomian revisited The Royal – Thomian is primarily about boys (including those disguised as older and wiser men). The general melee of a Royal – Thomian in our day would guarantee two things. More booze. More chaos. More riotous dancing. And then more booze. So I lied, that’s more than two – but in those days, we... Sanjana Hattotuwa, March 13, 2008
  • Mobile Phones Connections Cut In Jaffna Mobile phones are of no use now in Jaffna. The purpose of using mobile phones is to pass on any urgent message, but mobile phone connections are being cut often in Jaffna. Generally for more than half the day, connections are out. More than one lakh mobile phone users are there in Jaffna. addthis_url ... jafrep, May 10, 2007

| Share this article on Facebook

John C said,

March 10, 2009 @ 11:08 am

the governments in colombo have never been about cricket 100% have they? I being a thomian 14 years younger understand the need for police barricades in today's context. things will never go back to the 'good old days' sanjana, it's sad but it's the truth. and i guess we've evolved enough to go trucking in the midst of all of that… :)

laksundara said,

March 10, 2009 @ 3:42 pm

Esto Perpetua…

I weep for thee, if thy children have lost the daringness and honesty…

or is it that… even children fear to engage in the care-freeness that comes with youth with the prevailing environment…

or is that the responsible elders exercise prudence, over-riding youthfulness…

sad about the souvenir editorial decisions…

Groundviews said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:36 am

The horror or delight in looking at your posterior is best left for others. That said, why on earth give more fuel to those who already accuse us of a certain fixation on them?!

Channa Munasinghe said,

March 11, 2009 @ 6:26 am

I fail to comprehend whether this post is about rekindling memories or a political witch hunt. If it’s the latter then I’m not educated enough to comment. If its about the 1995/96 Royal-Thomian there are a few discrepancies.

“14 years ago, Sri Lanka was a different place. We were happier. Less stressed. Less anxious. Less politically correct”….WTF??!! SL was not a different place dude. Just that we didn’t have jobs, we lived with our parents, we didn’t have wives/in-laws, we didn’t have kids!!! I could go on with that list but I guess you get my point.

Channa Munasinghe said,

March 11, 2009 @ 6:27 am

“There were no barricades, no army, no armed guards, no Police, no checkpoints”. I’m not sure whether you’re talking about Colombo. In 1995/96 about 10 days before the LTTE bombed the Central Bank. One of the main reasons I remember the bombing was because that ruined my chances of going ‘trucking’ in my last year at college. I know its sad but like you said, we were less politically correct. Guess that also puts the Galle Face matter to rest :-D

Channa Munasinghe said,

March 11, 2009 @ 6:27 am

There are cheerleaders at the roy-tho??!! Since when? Thanks for telling. I will try getting drunk a little later during the match. Hopefully that’ll help me catch a glimpse of one of these. Hope I won’t regret it!! 

Sorry brohime that’s all I have time for. However, just a thought. The Royal-Thomian has always been played in a certain spirit and political affiliations, I can guarantee you, were/is not a part of it. In my opinion anybody who uses it to push cheap political agendas never really ‘understood’ what the Royal-Thomian is and any memory rekindled is just a mere fallacy.

Groundviews said,

March 11, 2009 @ 6:36 am

Channa,

The failure of comprehension is not limited to those points, but never mind, I'll take you for your word that you are not educated enough to comment. But since this realisation does not prevent you from going on to do so, I was pointing to the qualitative difference in the militarisation of polity and society. You weren't for example questioned by the CDF or arrested by the Police if you took photos outside a school. There weren't barricades around the entrances. There wasn't a sense of being garrisoned. The reasons for the emergence of security runs parallel to the increase in violence leading to an all consuming war at present. But this only qualifies the point that Thomians in and entering College today would face – literally and metaphorically – very different circumstances than when I was in College.

Groundviews said,

March 11, 2009 @ 6:37 am

Ref comment above – the point was made in relation to the vicinity of schools and the overall context.

Groundviews said,

March 11, 2009 @ 6:43 am

A prominent mobile telecoms company had plonked them to jump up and down whenever they pleased, but especially when there was a 4 or 6. Can't remember whether they were biased towards Royal or us…

You contradict yourself in the last paragraph, but given that you coined an entirely new English word to begin with, I didn't expect too much.

channa munasinghe said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:16 am

I really regret posting that comment today. Sundays I have time for interlectual masterbation :) nway here goes. FOR SPARTA!!! :-D
If that's the example for 'militarisation' of society, maybe its required. Why would you want to take a photo outside a school? Unless of course you are a pedo or terra. On the other hand what you do in your spare time is entirely up to you.

channa munasinghe said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:18 am

Generalization is a dangerous word in a ‘journalists’ vocabulary.

Groundviews said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:28 am

Comprehension is a desired quality in a 'commentator'.

channa munasinghe said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:32 am

Cool. Will try to be sober to check them out this tym. But if I regret, damn you for being sober enough to notice ugly chicks!!! :)
For the word meaning of the word "broheim", I suggest you look here (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=br... For judging me on a typo i suggest you look under asshole! :)

Groundviews said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:32 am

I agree, you really must stick to onanism, intellectual or otherwise. On the topic of taking photographs, perhaps the debate can be taken up with Nalaka, who bases a compelling article on an incident where a credentialed photojournalist was taken in for questioning by a CDF – http://www.groundviews.org/2008/02/14/endangered-...

trueblue said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:36 am

dear sanjana – few point for your thought, and for publication here for another view…
1. the tent committee (i bileve) would have asked to contribute a article based on your "good english". they wouldnt have selected you for your political views … so you are becoming more like a "political wolve" who goes and talks about his great deeds at a kindergarden opening… (remiands me of the " dog flee" story in your time".
2. you talk about sms, romaing? are you implaying these are not needed or is a necessary change? i dont quite understand , but 14 years of change does mean all this have happened? so are you trying to show the level of change?
3. you talk about security, the arms and forces being out – i guess until one from your family gets killed by a bomb or saved by a security forces personnel, you will not truely value their contribution and continue to moan about the practical aspects of guarding a nation at war…

trueblue said,

March 11, 2009 @ 7:37 am

4. the last bit -about college being the best the is and will be… try to be a bit more modest -(which most thomians are,) as their would have been equalent contributions from many other place (which your cant prove otherwise) so lay off a bit on the elitist approach…
5. personnally – you trying to discredit the tent committee chair on a public forum due to a personal piece of writing is "just not cricket mate"…

Nalin said,

March 11, 2009 @ 8:03 am

This post talks about a situation not 14 but 40 years ago.Either you were not there in Sri Lanka then or you are trying to send a message across by twisting facts.14 years ago there were enough marketing activities surrounding the Roy Tho with Saylan Bank as the main sponsor.AT that time there were 4 mobile phone companies with brands Celltel,Mobitel,Dialog GSM and Call link.They were still using the brick phone but there were much smaller mobile phones.
At that time we had security blocks and Army,Police personnel giving protection to the big match and surrounding areas.
We at Royal had to take our books in a transparent bag to make it easy for the security guards to check for explosives.At that time Galle face had no grass.They replanted grass back after 2000 under the guidance of Mangala as the Urban development minister.Now Galle Face has grass.If you are not sure go and have a look.Then again,you might not go there as you are scared of the security forces personnel.

Groundviews said,

March 11, 2009 @ 8:17 am

You are forgiven for being suspected of carrying explosives, and for other lapses in judgement and comprehension.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

This is a moderated forum. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Please do not post comments that are off topic, defamatory, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Comments are automatically scanned for spam and obscenity.

Comments are only approved if they are in line with the site guidelines. Those that do not will be edited or deleted without prior intimation. Comment approval may take up to 24 hours.

Thanks in advance for your civil and constructive engagement.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free