groundviews is a Sri Lankan citizen journalism initiativeregister here.login.find out more
inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Online journalism is the way forward, but tell this to Sri Lankan media companies

GROSS PLAGIARISM BY NIBRAS BAWA, AUTHOR OF THIS POST

A sharp reader alerted Groundviews that this article contains plagiarised content. Upon further inspection, we discovered that entire portions of the article have been copied verbatim from other web sources. This is a clear violation of site guidelines, and we sincerely apologise to the original content owners and producers over the inadvertent publication of their material herein.

An explanation by Nibras Bawa, the author, in response to an email sent by Groundviews as to how this occurred is published here, with a few sources named.

However, we strongly reject the point that plagiarism is relative and think it is rather silly to take, verbatim, material from other sites and parade them as one’s own.

Further, in addition to the site noted by Magerata and subsequently by us, Nibras Bawa has clearly and incredibly plagiarised from other web sources. Noting these, we have edited the article accordingly.

###

[Edited out for reasons stated at beginning of article.]

For example, what comes to one’s mind when one thinks of a Sri Lankan media company website? No offence meant to any media industry stakeholders, but these websites are rife with horrible layouts, graphics, sensationalism driven news, 404 error pages, broken links, browser incompatibility, and outdated technology. You have to see it to believe it (no pun intended).

Cases in point are online video on these media sites. The number of news web sites that put pre-roll ads in front of their online videos in shocking. A clever soul thinks that they have to poison every conceivable piece of content with advertising. You already have me at your site and you are jamming as much advertising as you can at me. Can I just watch the damn video please?

[Edited out, content taken from here without attribution.]

But the innovation of Sri Lankan journalism on the Internet has lagged.

[Edited out for reasons stated at beginning of article.]

[Edited out, content taken from here without attribution.]

[Edited out for content taken verbatim from here.]

[Edited out for reasons stated at beginning of article.]

The technology folks at these companies can’t even figure out how to leverage a good open source CMS to serve fairly static content at the fastest possible throughput. It is unreasonable therefore to expect them to develop technology to do anything transactional?

[Edited out for content taken verbatim from here.]

Consumers use internet for entertainment and communication and they will go to alternatives like facebook, and I would argue that 2 years from now most Srilankans will get their news update from Twitter and not from any of the news sites.

But to me if Sri Lanka really wants to move forward, they need to stop hiring suits, and start hiring jeans. Take a gamble, waste some money.

[Edited out for content taken verbatim from here.]

Print this post
652 have read this this article so far. You may also find these articles interesting:
  • Online election campaigns in Sri Lanka: The way forward As the presidential race heats up in Srilanka, the sheer volume of content and Ads that burst forth about this election is astonishing. The Internet is now a gateway for millions of ordinary Srilankans to participate in the political process. Mahinda Rajapakse has made an early splash. But every presidential candidate has a presence of some... Nibras Bawa, January 8, 2010
  • Email and content sharing upgrades on Groundviews Groundviews is pleased to announce improvements to its back-end email subscription service. You can now enter any email address and have new articles emailed to you, in full, as soon as they are posted on the site. You can sign up by entering your email here. We’ve also made it easier for you to share any article... Groundviews, September 27, 2008

| Share this article on Facebook

No to Journalism said,

March 17, 2010 @ 12:05 am

The writer Nibras Bawa forgot one important point, Online censorship.
Offline is very difficult once the papers are out, but hacking and banning sites is easy, especially in Srilanka.
Can this be a reason why our media companies don’t like the internet? They know the risks on internet. Just my 2 cents.

This good news for us... We are developing website its called www.serendibnews.com.au it only the intial stages said,

March 17, 2010 @ 3:16 am

Hi very happy with your comments… Our publication is based in Australia started 10 years ago…. we have realise printing limited.

Online have so much of potential.

We strated distributing news through facebook everyday we have over 12,000 subscribers. very good start for us.

Ranaviru Bandara said,

March 17, 2010 @ 5:44 am

Yes, in this age of technology this is the way to go. Last year I attended an international conference on journalism in Australia and it was said that in about another 5 years time the notion of reading a printed newspaper will be obsolete. Already news sites are being developed for people to customise the news they’d like to read etc. In Sri Lanka thsi will be valuable especially when jouranlism is matter of life & death job. The valuable contribution our journalists make could be celebrated more with online publishing!

Mike said,

March 17, 2010 @ 10:33 am

The writer is too idealistic and too ignorant of the ground realities in Colombo media scene.

Please see the ground reality first. i.e, low pc and broadband access, credit card fearpsychosis, lack of talent, money, instruments coupled with cyber tracking and censorship and many more hurdles. In this context your arguments don’t hold true. They are just ideals of a lankan westerner.

Janaka ( Australia) said,

March 17, 2010 @ 11:03 am

Online Journalism has become a joke in Sri Lanka. How can any idiot could publish bogus information without any accountability? Best examples are anti-government Lankatruth, Lankanewsweb, lankaEnews and pro government lankaCnews . All these online media shops are operated from either overseace or in tin houses out skirts of colombo and 99% of the news published on these above mentioned sites are overly exaggerated and mostly fabricated. The media freedom has become a joke in sri lanka because of few who mis-use the freedom.
Not so long ago in Australia, an average citizen was fined $50000 and 6 months prison sentence under the defamation law for criticizing a government minister. Yet Sri Lankans screams they do not have media freedom. LOL…

Dr. Ron Ross said,

March 17, 2010 @ 10:41 pm

Greetings:

Thank you for your thoughtful and articulate review of the SriLankan media and its interest (or lack of interest) in citizen journalism.

We are avid supporters of citizen journalism around the world and have just finished publishing a 200+ page book, “Handbook for Citizen Journalists.” We also provide on-line training for citizen journalists to our members.

If you are interested we would be willing to send you a free copy of “Handbook for Citizen Journalists” as a pdf. We would be very interested in your view of the book and how we may help each other in the advancement of citizen journalism around the world.

Dr. Ron Ross, Catalyst-in-Chief

magerata said,

March 18, 2010 @ 3:36 am

Hi Mr.Bawa, Since we are talking about journalism, it would have been nice if you gave some references, like where you seem to have got a few paragraphs,
word for word from another site ; http://www.gauravonomics.com/blog/are-indian-news-media-and-entertainment-companies-social-media-savvy/
Which I happened to have read last December, or so. Following is the paragraph I am talking about, I do not know about the rest of the post

In the US, the ubiquity of the Internet has forced news, media and entertainment companies to become early adopters of social technologies and experiment with all the five underlying drivers of

Consumer generated content (CNN iReport)
Conversations (NPR Community)
Collaboration (Al Jazeera War on Gaza)
Community (NYT Times People)
Collective intelligence (CNN News Pulse)

Groundviews said,

March 18, 2010 @ 4:27 am

@magerata,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. After your comment, checking up on the rest of the article revealed plagiarised content taken off from at least three sources,

http://www.npost.com/2009/11/09/why-the-great-indian-media-companies-will-fail-on-the-internet…/
http://www.digitaltonto.com/2009/how-great-media-companies-fail-on-the-internet/
http://indianstartupgyaan.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/why-the-great-indian-media-companies-will-fail-on-the-internet/#comment-101

The author has been asked to respond.

Gypsy said,

March 18, 2010 @ 7:20 am

Shameful. But utterly unsurprising.

Nibras Bawa said,

March 18, 2010 @ 10:58 am

@ Magerata & @Groundviews,

Hi,

Firstly, thanks for pointing this out. Appreciate it. Sanjana had sent a mail and I responded to him a while ago.

As for plagiarism, its how one looks at it, and Plagiarism is a relative term.

I had mentioned, “Compiled from” and included sources in my original Mac version, since many people in SL don’t use Mac, i thought I’d send that in Windows format. In the process however I made some changes. I hadn’t included same, nor did I run a spell check. Truth be told, I edited the original version I had.

That being said, this was honestly unintentional, rather a genuine mistake that I accept. I value and respect my own self-imposed guidelines let alone Groundviews guidelines. Yes, I too hate plagiarism ☺

As you can see some relevant pieces, examples and info were taken, I compiled this with some of my own input that cannot be questioned I believe. But I admit the mistake in not including sources in the version sent to Sanjana though I had them in my Mac version. What was sent to sanjana was a Windows version with HTML included.

Just to be clear, the sources I should have cited were,

http://www.godinchief.com/entry/why-do-indian-media-companies-suck-internet/

http://www.digitaltonto.com/2009/how-great-media-companies-fail-on-the-internet/

http://indianstartupgyaan.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/why-the-great-indian-media-companies-will-fail-on-the-internet/#comment-101

I respect groundviews, and its efforts, which is the reason i contribute to the site. I think I’ve made myself clear, should you still wish to take down my post please do so. Upto you. I’d respect that.

I however intend contributing to Groundviews in the future too, and rest assured if content and examples taken from other sites they will be given due credits for. I should check my copy many times before sending… Learnt my lesson here :)

Anyways, my unconditional and sincere apology to all concerned. Although unintentional and purely a technical error on my part, I understand the scenario and apologize should this cause any inconvenience to anyone.

Hope this clarifies.

Thanks for bringing this up to me. Appreciate it.

Best of luck.

Nibras

indi said,

March 18, 2010 @ 12:21 pm

if it’s plagiarized, why is the article still up?

Groundviews said,

March 18, 2010 @ 1:04 pm

@Indi, we were waiting for response from author, which is now published here. Given the inadequacy of the explanation and that the author, incredibly, has plagiarised from more sources than he cares to mention even in this explanatory note, we have edited the article and taken out the offending content.

Observer said,

March 18, 2010 @ 2:33 pm

This is poor. Retract this article! It is one thing writing rubbish or poorly, copying is just shameful!

Btw Nibras, citing doesn’t allow you to copy verbatim unless you specifically highlight it using quotation marks or italics followed immediately with a footnote sourcing the original content. Tips for your next writing endeavour.

This is a general comment, I rarely see GV authors use references in their articles. It’s something you should encourage. Especially when it comes to numerical data. Such as casualty figures, and historical dates, occurrences. You should also make references mandatory for quotations and official statements.

DD said,

March 18, 2010 @ 2:48 pm

http://www.plagiarism.org/index.html

Plagiarism is not a relative term.

“pla·gia·rism n
1. copying what somebody else has written or taking somebody’s else’s idea and trying to pass it off as original.
2. something copied from somebody else’s work, or somebody else’s idea that somebody presents as his or her own”
Encarta® World English Dictionary © 1999 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Developed for Microsoft by Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Interestingly I have accompanied and represented many students at University Education Council meetings defending them for plagiarism and copyright infringement in coursework.

Majority of these students are international students and not native English language speakers. So many use this in defence. This becomes a nightmare, especially in subjects like law where you have to quote previous judgments.

Finally the English Department head’s involvement at a policy meeting was sought.

Everyone agreed on following the fundamentals of English grammar and the rules for use of quotations as the first principle in judging those accused of plagiarism.

Despite my Che Guevara sensitivities, I reluctantly agreed. Having learnt English mainly through the speaking of the language and reading books my grammar and spelling is much wanting? But not to at least italicising or including within quotation marks what you obtain from other sources is no excuse.

The distinction here is that this was a pure cut and paste outright crib. Why bring yourself to disrepute for something as silly boggles my mind.

james said,

March 18, 2010 @ 4:25 pm

This type of stunt is not surprising when you consider the past behavior and ethics of the author!

Nibras Bawa said,

March 18, 2010 @ 5:52 pm

@ all self-righteous cyber ethical heroes,

Er.. Where do I start? OK, the case in point, plagiarism or not is a relative matter. Grounviews and I aren’t experts on this area. But given the context; I don’t think it amounts to blatant plagiarism. I had said this was entirely a technical error, I mean I don’t have anything to prove it other than my own words, but its what it is. I don’t think I am that stupid to have plagiarized on a well read, respected and if I may add self-righteous site. There were subtle ways to do that if I really wanted to. No need an outright copy paste job. That sucks to me as much as it does to you.

As for Groundviews sources, it is possible same content was syndicated in many sites. Citing as many sources shouldn’t necessarily mean they are all different content. The content was same; I got one from one site, and groundviews from another, maybe another person from another.. Its how the web works. Content gets syndicated in so many weird ways. This is also due phising sites. As such I’d stick to my claims on my sources. But yes, it is possible for them to be on other sites as well, as Groundviews had pointed out. But that shouldn’t mean i’ve taken from there and i should’ve mentioned them as well..

I maintained a blog that was reasonably well read, but created a stir by exposing a person who was a pain in the neck, then someone alerted my Dad and I guess that was the end of it. As of today, I don’t maintain a blog, but I felt I needed to get this message across. Lets face it, Srilankan sites suck. I felt strongly about it, and needed an avenue. Hence the article in question on Groundviews. I didn’t want to hide behind an anonymous blog either, so I thought I’d use Groundviews, and for all the right reasons. That was my only intention. But i seemed to have messed it up now.

Despite my explanation someone at the helm of affairs at Groundviews is hell bent on proving me a plagiarist. Why? I wouldn’t know… and I am not one either. I had explained the context; furthermore I had also unconditionally apologized if anyone thought it necessary. I think it is silly to go on editing (actually cutting) only to prove one point, that someone plagiarized. Really? Why not you scrutinize every single post on Groundviews? Chances are you will have some more fodder to prove your self righteousness (Pun intended).

I guess I am going to completely stop browsing Srilankan sites on the net.. Too much trouble, and its not worth it.. Gosh little did I know I’d end up this way..

I am not whining and acting innocent. Certainly not. I am only making my stance clear.. Groundviews has the option to delete completely, or edit as it sees fit, or even dedicate a few more new posts and tweets explaining how I plagiarized and how their intelligence worked to catch me red handed… I lack sensationalism these days, and I’d enjoy the fun.. Its been a while since i last got some attention :)

Here I officially end. No offence meant to anyone… Just one point, unintentional error, but sorry, and I mean it.

Oh yeah… I have my own self imposed morale guidelines when I sit with my keyboard, and I can assure you they aren’t that different from Grounviews guidelines : )

Best of luck everyone.

Thanks

Nibras

DD said,

March 18, 2010 @ 6:52 pm

Mate you got done.

I know it, you know it, everyone knows it.

Please stop deluding yourself.

Sooner or later you were going to self destruct, you just did! You just lost any sort of equity, respect or credibility you had. No one likes a plagiarizer.

Thats all.

DD said,

March 18, 2010 @ 6:55 pm

Anything created on a Mac now is Windows/PC friendly other than creations on actual design programs.

magerata said,

March 18, 2010 @ 8:42 pm

Well I never thought this will go this far, I liked the article and read it until I came across 5C’s. I had taken as notes from the original author on the five C’s for one of my own papers and recognized it immediately. Therefor the comment. I assumed that the author could edit to include the references. Anyway now I see it is beyond 5C’s.

james said,

March 19, 2010 @ 9:55 am

“Oh yeah… I have my own self imposed morale guidelines when I sit with my keyboard, and I can assure you they aren’t that different from Grounviews guidelines : ) ”

These so called ‘morale guidelines’ were surprisingly non-evident in the past when the author deliberately published photos and personal details such as home addresses and personal contact numbers of another blogger who desired to be anonymous!

Of course, I fully expect the author to totally deny any such actions, and claim he in fact was the true victim of a masterfully executed online persecution campaign! :)

ImaHassen said,

March 25, 2010 @ 3:29 pm

“I had mentioned, “Compiled from” and included sources in my original Mac version, since many people in SL don’t use Mac, i thought I’d send that in Windows format.”

My $0.02: Documents created using MS Office/Word on Mac are compatible with Windows without any special effort. Apple’s own productivity suite iWork on Mac supports a one-click Export to Word option. No brainer.

More people in Sri Lanka use Mac than you’d imagine. But what relevance does it hold when you’re publishing online?

Having said all that, the author’s response pertaining to plagiarism and continuous denial/evasion is rather unfortunate.

Plagiarism is never relative. You either did it, or you didn’t.

Wayne said,

March 31, 2010 @ 8:55 pm

I think nibras has apologized and we all understand. Let’s just let it go shall we?

Wayne said,

March 31, 2010 @ 8:57 pm

Sadly we Sri Lankans are not used to forgiving, correcting and moving on. the correction has been made. We did not approve, it was a mistake. That said and done, let’s move on lest we too are judged HARSHLY for whatever mistakes WE make in life.

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

This is a moderated forum. Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. Please do not post comments that are off topic, defamatory, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Comments are automatically scanned for spam and obscenity.

Comments are only approved if they are in line with the site guidelines. Those that do not will be edited or deleted without prior intimation. Comment approval may take up to 24 hours.

Thanks in advance for your civil and constructive engagement.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free