groundviews is a Sri Lankan citizen journalism initiativeregister here.login.find out more
inicio mail me! sindicaci;ón

Akon and Buddhism in Sri Lanka

The Government on Tuesday (March 23rd) announced its decision to deny an entry visa to singer Akon who was scheduled to perform next month in Colombo with co-singers, J-Sean and Kelly. The basis for the denial of Akon’s visa was a music video of the singer, containing a clip of scantily clad models dancing against the back drop of a Buddhist statue. The Government’s decision has been ratified by the Cabinet. The announcement came soon after the MTV/MBC head office was attacked by a group of armed thugs attached to a notorious politician for organizing the event.

Prior to the attack, a group of Buddhist Monks expressed their dismay over bringing down someone like “Akon” who had insulted Lord Buddha and Buddhism in his music videos, an allegation the singer vehemently denies.

It is against this dramatic backdrop that I wish to express my views on the whole Akon drama. As a follower of the Buddhist Philosophy, I don’t think anything can undermine or undervalue the greatness of the Buddhist philosophy or the respect for Lord Buddha.

Among the primary concepts of Buddhist philosophy is “The Middle Way,” the practice of avoiding extreme views and lifestyle choices.  Lord Buddha had also taught the importance of Tolerance and Equanimity (Upeksha), and had demonstrated them in his personality.

Buddhist literature describes the manner in which the Lord Buddha treated women like Sundhari Paribrajika and Chinchimanavika, even those who vilified him in public. Lord Buddha did not chase them out of the Monastery nor did the Buddha ask them to be arrested or charged in court. The Buddha simply maintained silence and demonstrated compassion to those who insulted him. That was the example the Lord Buddha set to his followers: tolerance and compassion to those who defame you.

Lord Buddha opened the door of his Sasana to everyone including murderers, thieves, prostitutes and the lower castes. According to Buddhist texts “Lady Patachara” who was in a weak mental state following the death of her family, did not have a cloth on her body when she came running towards the Monastery where the Lord Buddha resided. Although Patachara was in a state of shock, the Lord Buddha expressed his compassion to her.

This was not the only instance where an artist has been accused of releasing material prejudicial to ethnic groups and religious harmony. Late King of Pop, Michael Jackson was also criticised for his lyrics in the song, “They Don’t Really Care About Us” which contained a phrase, “Jew me, sue me everybody do me, kick me, kike me, don’t you black or white me” which was dubbed “anti-semitic.” Jackson later apologized for the lyrics and later changed them for his single.

Singer Akon now says that he was not aware about the statue being on his set, when he shot the video. Following the decision by the Government to deny entry visa to Akon, the disheartened singer has released a statement saying, “I would never set out to offend or desecrate anyone’s religion or religious beliefs.  I myself am a spiritual man, so I can understand why they are offended, but violence is never the answer and I am disheartened to hear about what happened in Sri Lanka”.

I feel that the Government’s decision to deny a visa to Akon on the grounds of blasphemy is unwise and not according to the principles of the Buddhist Philosophy. The Government was gracious enough to invite the Leader of the Myanmar Junta who’s alleged to have committed atrocities against civilians and Buddhist Monks in Myanmar. It’s also amusing to see the very person who staged a demonstration outside the Kelaniya Temple vilifying General Sarath Fonseka when he paid a visit to the temple, contesting the upcoming Parliamentary Election.

In my view it’s not Akon who has insulted the Lord Buddha and his teachings. It is the Noble Buddha Shrawakas (followers) living in this “Paradise Island” that have insulted the Lord Buddha and his teachings by our double standards!

Print this post
8,283 have read this this article so far. You may also find these articles interesting:
  • Akon and Buddhism in Sri Lanka: A Response to Bhikkhu K. Tanchangya [Editor's note: This article is a rejoinder to “Akon and Buddhism in Sri Lanka – A Monk's Response” by Bhikkhu K. Tanchangya published on the Buddhist Channel website on the 28th of March 2010. Bhikkhu K. Tanchangya's article was a response to the author's original article 'Akon and Buddhism in Sri Lanka'.] I wrote “Akon and... tis-a-small-world, April 2, 2010
  • Renunciation We turned out of bed saddened and furious when we heard Taliban detonated the Bamiyan Buddhas: What savagery, to destroy testaments aged over centuries, to a now effaced history; but today let us rejoice, Akon the singer has been denied a visa and a chance to feed the unruly and sexual minds of a sold-out Sri Lankan crowd, Christians no doubt, urbane Muslims certainly, even some fallen gautamas, they can’t be trusted pogo dancing, and we don’t want skin... Indran Amirthanayagam, March 25, 2010

| Share this article on Facebook

wijayapala said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:14 am

Dear tis-a-small-world,

I completely agree with you. Sri Lanka should open its doors to all the refuse of the West bringing the eloquent “Sexy Bitch” lyrics.

I am looking forward to the day when all Sri Lankans- Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim- refer to women as “bitch” or “hoe” and thus become a truly enlightened society.

Burning_Issue said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:30 am

This is just a tip of an iceberg; there is much more to come from the Sinhala Buddhist Nationalists! I know that I will offend many genuinely decent Sinhala Buddhists by pointing this out.

The Sinhalese very rightly accused the Tamil masses for not rising up against the LTTE terrorism. But that very Sinhala masses are silent on the face of rising Sinhala Buddhist extremism. Ironically, the Tamil Hindus will be safe as long as they do not ask for separation, but both the Muslims and Christians watch your back!

Sam said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:35 am

Yes, AKON is a the light of enlightenment, perhaps we can follow his example and have simulatd sex on stage with 14 year olds, run about bashing female fans and steal cars just like AKON; that sounds like an awesome thing to do and it will certainly propel as forward culturally and we will be on par with the far more advanced west. Perhaps we can also make our own music video and play it on all our TV stations which show ”bitches and hos” dancing with G strings around a statue of Jesus or Mary mother of Jesus and show it off in Negombo where Catholics are in a majority… or maybe a video of the same with “bitches and hoes” dancing half naked around a statue of Prophet Muhammad and show it off in Kalmunai where Muslims are in the majority? That would be only fair and it we would be demonstrating out commitment to freedom of speech/expression and become a REAL democracy.

Burning_Issue said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:40 am

Dear Wijayapala,

“I am looking forward to the day when all Sri Lankans- Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim- refer to women as “bitch” or “hoe” and thus become a truly enlightened society”

We both agree that, generally the Sri Lankans are not stupid people. We bring up children teaching the values that we know and practice; they should be able to sift through anything that is thrown at them and judge for themselves as to what is right and wrong.

Where would one draw the line in terms of protecting a society in this digital age? In my view the society should rise above all this and become strong; this is where the focus should be on and not at banning anything and everything; it is pathetic.

Nihal Fernando said,

March 27, 2010 @ 8:36 am

Dear Mr Wijayapala – I quite agree with you. In the western world the woman is only a conceivable material.with some utility values but our buddhist way we have been taught to respect them. The mothehood of a woman is only second to Buddhahood and we have have great reverance on them. We do not want any man black or white to come to our shore and display his male chuvinism calling “Sexy Bitch” in a public performance.with or without Buddha’s statue. They also have a lot of four letter words in their raps that are even detested by some in America.

SomewhatDisgusted said,

March 27, 2010 @ 9:16 am

Wijayapala,

That’s orthogonal to the point. The *reason* expressed for denying visa is insult to Buddhism, not crudity or uselessness.

2nd Southerner said,

March 27, 2010 @ 9:17 am

We all know how the buddha is portrayed in the west; the statues, pictures, figures are all placed in inappropriate places and disrespected. Our tolerance levels are tested here. We email each other and others back home how the buddha is treated in the western world. We condemn how the buddha is treated. We try to reach out to the western media and appropriate authorities that what is being done to the buddha is inappropriate and disrespectful to our religion and little attention is given to us.

So in a way it is good that he got denied.

Him being unaware of a statue being there on his set is just plain irresponsible. Still think he should offer an apology that holds more value than a lousy PR statement if he really wants to come down to SL.

Shamed Lankan said,

March 27, 2010 @ 10:22 am

To Nihal Fernando and Wijayapala: Here’s a novel idea: If you and your friends don’t want to see Akon, don’t go see him! But how about letting other, more open-minded people make up their own minds with you doing it for them? I realize promoting independent thinking is frowned upon – and probably illegal – in Mahinda Rajapakse’s Sri Lanka, where the government determines what people should see, hear and listen to.
By the way, Nihal, the way you describe Sri Lankans’ attitude toward women, one would think that domestic abuse, sexual violence and other crimes against women don’t exist in Sri Lanka. I have no idea under which rock you live, but let me assure you, Sri Lanka is not immune from violence against women. And it has nothing to do with rap lyrics or images in a music video.
It’s because of people like you that Sri Lanka will always be a backward, Third World nation.

Praveen said,

March 27, 2010 @ 11:04 am

I believe the best way to respect Gautama Buddha and all Buddhas of the past is to put their teachings into practice. The Buddha is not somewhere up in the sky shaking his head in disapproval at Akon’s video…he has left his plane of existence for good. All that remains are his teachings and the practice of Vipassana that he has showed us. I think we should focus on bettering ourselves rather than impose regulations upon others.

yapa said,

March 27, 2010 @ 12:17 pm

For our idiots denying visa to Akon is a much significant issue than insulting the Lord Buddha. All are voicing for Akon, why is this enthusiasm? Why this much of fuss? Are these paid agents of Akon?

I think most want to show that they are full of post-modern ideas. I don’t see any other reason to rally round an insignificant man for us. Why there is no such enthusiasm to bring down a great scientist like Stephen Hawking? Soon I think these idiots will pay homage to brats like Akon instead of Lord Buddha or Jesus Christ.

Also there is a popular tendency in many of the “modern thinkers” and Buddhism bashers to quote Buddhist teaching itself to undermine Buddhism. This is a case of “Urage malu urage ange thiyala kepeema” (Cutting pork keeping on the pig itself). They quote Buddhist teaching out of context for its destruction. This is a very common crude method used by superficial thinkers. They have no creativity to find a better way to bash something. Their ulterior motive is clearly visible and they have no capacity even to hide it.

See how these moderners have excited when some thing against their will is taken place. Are these not fundamentalists than who threw stones at MTV. They (stone thewers at MTV) at least threw stones against something bad happened to a part and parcel of their lives. The cyberspace stone throwers and media stone throwers are throwing their stones for a man whose name was never known before a couple of weeks ago.

These modern fundamentalists think that even a crow cannot fly over their heads. They protest against them.

These are not more than modern parrots who do not know anything more than what they were taught. They are repeatedly uttering what they were taught by their masters. No, they are just tape records or CD’s which play when their masters push their buttons.

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 27, 2010 @ 12:35 pm

“Ironically, the Tamil Hindus will be safe as long as they do not ask for separation, but both the Muslims and Christians watch your back!”

Please do not try to create another non existing irrelevant issue out of this incident.

Thanks!

BUddhi said,

March 27, 2010 @ 1:35 pm

Those who support for Akon,
Buddha Statues can be purchased from anywhere in the world. Most people are keeping it as a decoration.
Has anyone see that jesus is keeping as a decoration ?
because only few people are fellowers of buddhism and treat as their religion.
My its constitution Sri lankan government must protect buddhism and this type of actions are part of it.
Those who are wishing a free country please tell me where it is exit? every country in the world are having their own protection sytem their own law and etc. If any Sri Lankan not happy then you can immigrate to the so called free country.

Nihal Fernando said,

March 27, 2010 @ 2:57 pm

Shamed Lankan – Freedom of speech/expression, hullabaloo does not mean anybody can visit our country and display vulgar, outlandish, gross, barbaric performance to down grade our own cultural values. Our tolerance has been taken as our weakness by many of the Westerners that want to subjugate Sinhala to whims and fancies of their Christian idelogy. I do not mean to say that we do not have domestic violence, sexual abuse of women in our country. There are of course some incidents here and there. Let alone the Buddha statue but why should we so taken up so much with this Akon guy when he calls a woman “Sexy bitch” in his rap-crap? Will his presence take us to a forward march.

Sinhala_Voice said,

March 27, 2010 @ 3:44 pm

HEY ALL THOSE LIBERALS>>>>

Why don’t western countries allow free drugs ??????

I guess the issue here is the same.

We have certain values in our country. And Akon does not stack up to any of those.

I doubt whether Akon can do a tour in Malaysia or Pakistan or India or Saudi Arabia or Indonesia or the Vatican City ……

The reason why Akon should be not allowed to tour is that this type of people are against the ETHOS of Sri Lanka. If they are Sri Lankan we have to tolerate them BUT we don’t have to import these RUBBISH from overseas to Sri Lanka.

HAVING A BUDDHA STATUE IN THE BACKGROUND IS NOT THE ISSUE HERE.

Raji said,

March 27, 2010 @ 4:01 pm

“Will his presence take us to a forward march.”

Apparently some Sri Lankans believe he is some sort of messiah judging by the screaming and shouting witnessed after the government denied him a visa. The funniest was some lady on TV saying that her basic human rights were violated when Akon was denied a visa… Frankly I think there are far, far better artists that Sri Lanka should have over.

Patriot said,

March 27, 2010 @ 5:31 pm

Some of the comments above talk abt nude women etc. Well the very people must realise that a huge majority of the urban youth (Mostly Bhuddists and christians since hindus and muslims grow up with strict religious backgrounds) fill up the clubs in near to naked clothes end up with some random person overnight. If none of you have ever been to the Hikka festival, well i would say you go experience it once before you bleat on about Akon and his attraction to women.

devotee said,

March 27, 2010 @ 6:52 pm

Sam, one word of correction, there is no image or statue of Prophet Mohamed PBUM, muslim do not have statue, image or symbol. muslims pray Almighty Allah alone. and we are commanded to respect others religion because non-muslims might insult Allah in ignorance. so I respect other’s religion but I do have a question to my beloved buddhist brothers and scholars. Did Lord Buddha ever request to erect his statue in any places especially streets and park? I ask this question from my buddhist friends I did not get a clear answer Please, answer it with possible quotation.

Dr Dulip Perera said,

March 27, 2010 @ 6:52 pm

People must learn to respect religions, religious philosophy and related culturo-religious symboles. Bikini clad women dancing before a religious symbol is not and cannot be the western way of apreciating freedom of expression!!!

wijayapala said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:03 pm

Dear Burning_Issue

I left you a message, I don’t know whether you saw it:

http://www.groundviews.org/2010/02/27/living-secular-in-the-%E2%80%98sinhala-buddhist-republic%E2%80%99-of-sri-lanka/

I know that I will offend many genuinely decent Sinhala Buddhists by pointing this out.

If you define “decent Sinhala Buddhists” as those who support concerts featuring dry-humping 14-year olds on stage, then no you probably have not offended them!

both the Muslims and Christians watch your back!

I did not not observe the Catholic Church or the Ulema protest the visa denial. How do you think they look at this episode?

We bring up children teaching the values that we know and practice; they should be able to sift through anything that is thrown at them and judge for themselves as to what is right and wrong… this is where the focus should be on and not at banning anything and everything; it is pathetic.

In that case, why not follow this course to its logical conclusion and unban things that are banned in the West? What about child pornography? After all, if the children are brought up with proper values, they will naturally avoid these things and we have nothing to worry about.

wijayapala said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:11 pm

Dear Shamed Lankan,

It’s because of people like you that Sri Lanka will always be a backward, Third World nation.

And if you were in charge, Sri Lanka would be a backward, Third World nation where women are referred to as hoes.

Out of curiosity, do you happen to be a bitch (sexy or otherwise)? As a staunch Akon supporter, I will protest the govt’s censorship by using his language on this forum. I trust that only the Sinhala Buddhist extremists here will have a problem with this.

wijayapala said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:23 pm

Dear SomewhatDisgusted,

You are focusing on the cause, I am focusing on the effect.

Personally I didn’t find the video insulting to Buddhism. There have been far worse episodes in Sri Lanka such as the racist fishmongers in Trincomalee setting up Buddha next to their stalls.

In any case, Buddha statues lack substance in the sense that they do not portray what Siddhartha Gautama looked like. A Muslim friend of mine once correctly pointed out that Buddha was not depicted in human form for several hundred years after his death.

eddy said,

March 27, 2010 @ 7:28 pm

Akon is a clown used by some with agendas. Musicians should not get invlove in politics. The decision to stop is fair and just.We have enough of clowns and terrors, we need peace loving and reasonable people without ulterior motives.Keep the agendas going with more clowns.Runnin g short of ideas. To me Akon you are only so good for yourself. I would not give a hoot mate. [Go] off and go help your mates in Iraq and Afganistan.

wnamal said,

March 27, 2010 @ 8:12 pm

What is the big deal about Akon. I live in the West and came to know about Akon only after this new item. If you are a Buddhist coutry first practice what you preach. Journalist have been killed (not singing). Prageth Ekanaligoda has been kidnapped and his family is waiting for him. Sarath Fonseka who nearly died for the country is now in a so called luxury house languishing (Rajapakaya is taking revenge). Politicians are fielding actress to get the poor peoples votes. Here we are talking about Akon. The TV is full of junk local and international. So what is the big deal about Akio. It is just hypocracy. That is why the rogues will come to power again after the April elections. Sri Lanka is a land of Hypocrites. It is an ashame on the Buddha. People are talking nonsense including Akon. Ashame on you. Talk something useful.

Lord Basilisk said,

March 27, 2010 @ 9:58 pm

Most of the people think Akon is a god and that they should respect him. For my part I would miss a show from Akon rather than angering my brethren following Lord Buddha.

ramona therese fernando said,

March 27, 2010 @ 11:51 pm

Huge differences between Maha Sanga remaining “tight-lipped” in the Akron case, and a small % of them garrulously vocal in the political arena.

Being “tight-lipped” in the Akron case meant that the Maha Sanga was not inciting violence or even preaching against the shaking of flesh in front of the icon of Buddha. That a few stones and some anger was hurled at the office means that some of Buddha’s followers want to protect their religion, culture and heritage from that what is drapaved. Now this is a far cry from strapping bombs and blowing up oneself and/or others, but even this can be seen as the cry from the majority of persons of a country to protect that which is in their best interests, both morally and responsibly towards themselves, their families, their ancestors and their descendants.

So therefore, if the Sri Lankan government has decided to protect the national interests for the majority of her persons in true democratic style, and not give a visa towards an artist where a culture of religious perversion has been only too obvious, it is then for the best for the majority of her persons of her nation.

Another question must be also asked. Will this artist’s performance in Sri Lanka be of any financial benefit to the nation? Unlike building stadiums for cricket matches where an income generated from cricket enthusiasts from around world will bring in much needed foreign exchange, and furthermore it will encourage a healthy sporting activities in the nations and especially for the youth, it is then difficult to see how Akron’s visit to Sri Lanka will generate any funds.

Akron’s visit will generate funds in this way:

• Lankan fans (mostly pro-western), and who enjoy that kind of rapping music will buy tickets

• Money of such fans living in Sri Lanka (money coming from the GDP pool in Sri Lanka) will go towards paying Akron and his team. Money will not be re-invested in Sri Lanka, but come back to the US.

• Sisera which will get some share of the profit will build up their station and maybe re-invest in more rapping music and artists.

• 0.1% of people buying tickets for this concert will come from outside and therefore generate 0.1% of profit from tourists coming all the way from other countries to watch this artist in Sri Lanka. Statistically it is seen that most tourists come and want to come to Sri Lanka for the Buddhist and Hindu heritages and the allurement of their ancient cultures.

How much better will it be if Sisera spent this money in developing the local artistic scene.

ramona therese fernando said,

March 27, 2010 @ 11:54 pm

Sorry, i meant Akon!

SomewhatDisgusted said,

March 28, 2010 @ 12:03 am

Dear Wijayapala,

I agree with you on the effect and couldn’t care less for Akon or his slimy undulations and it probably is a good thing that neither the fellow nor his vile act is coming to Sri Lanka. However, it’s the cause that is under discussion. In that regard, what is your opinion on the reaction of the “angered Buddhists”? The very term seems an oxymoron and I do wonder how these so-called Buddhists relate it to the system of beliefs they are trying to teach others and what the Buddha himself would have to say about their actions? I truly feel sad that the name of such a great individual is being used to justify irrational and bigoted reactions.

Dear “Self-appointed holy guardians of Buddhism”,

As much as I love to hear how you consider yourselves to be guardians of ultimate truths, I sometimes do wonder why you don’t put your words into action, achieve Nirvana, and look at the rest of us deluded souls with some compassion? Surely, those privy to holy truths can easily convince us blasphemous mongrels by achieving Arahat status at the very least, and maybe doing a “yama maha pelahara” (a fire/water illusion emanating from the body) or perhaps use a little bit of “irdi balaya” (teleportation) to travel about and perhaps enlighten poor Akon? I ask because you insist on protecting your beliefs, but neither seem to understand not be able to demonstrate the truth of your claims either in practice or even at the very basic level of being compassionate and understanding.

All I see here is self-righteous anger, entirely reminiscent of the Taliban and other assorted Jihadists who went ballistic over that cartoon of Mohammed. At least they have an excuse for not being able to achieve anything in this earthly life, they have to die and be embraced by god after all. What in heaven’s name is your excuse?

Michael said,

March 28, 2010 @ 3:58 am

Personally, I don’t think Akon has got any talent and I am definitely not a fan. I wouldn’t have gone to his concert even if his visa was approved.

But I am seriously anxious about my own liberty, when the government gets to impose its own nationalism upon its people. I didn’t like it when they banned The Da Vinci Code in Sri Lankan cinemas, and I don’t like it when they denied Akon visa.

Problem is, most Sri Lankans don’t seem to care too much about personal liberty. Look at who they elected as President.

Michael said,

March 28, 2010 @ 4:01 am

Though the Da Vinci Code issue was not nationalistic, it was still a restriction on liberty that presupposed a lack of intelligence on the part of the public.

Rohana Arambewala said,

March 28, 2010 @ 6:54 am

Dear writer and some of the people made comments,

First of all writer has shown the understanding and knowledge of Buddhism in great depth and that is admirable. There is also a limit to tolerance as Buddha has himself shown and preached us. I am not going into these details as I am not knowlegable as some of you in buddhism.

It is sad to see some people have used this opportunity to attack the government for personal vandetta and their own griviences. We only have to look at what is at stake here.

This is not the first time Sri Lankan governments in the past has taken decisions to deny visas for various reasons, for example UNP govt under Ranil expelled a British journalist within 24 hours for pointing out the faults in his 2002 CFA. Other UNP and SLFP govts have done so. Also only last year present govt cancelled the Visa of a prominent Minister of a European government. It is the govt’s right to do so for various reasons.

Like other govts around world has either refused or cancelled visa to many prominent people including this so called Akon. His tour to Australia was cancelled last year as the govt refused a visa due to his past history especially because of his criminal activities against underage girls. I never saw or heard Australians crying fowl. Majority of people in a country elect a govt and then the govt takes decisions according to their believes and that is what is expected from them. By doing this you always expect the extremes of the losing party to be annoyed as they have become a frustrated lot.

Now this writer also jumped the gun by accusing the govt. for various acts ignoring the fact it was the JHU who was responsible first for these attacks and then other parties affiliated to the govt and now criminal minister Mervin. But the writer has ignored or refused to acknowledge that a group has accepted responsibility for the attack and the Police have charged few in connection with this.

I also like to ask these people what happens to anyone if they mention anything about “ALLAH” let alone statues? Millions around the world will be screaming about how wrong it is? how many days the person will live after that? This is not Sinhala Buddhist extremism and only extremists against Sinhala buddhists trying to make it as that. It is so sad to read some comments as if Sri Lanka is the worse country in the world and Sinhala Buddhists are the worse mankind in the world. But then this called buddhis is giving the opportunity for these extrmists a reason to scream.

LET ME TELL YOU ALL DON”T WASTE YOUR TIME ABOUT THIS ANYMORE AND GET ON WITH YOUR LIFE AND MOVE ON LET THIS CRIMINAL GO SOMEWHERE ELSE

Tis-a-small-world said,

March 28, 2010 @ 8:18 am

Dear mr.rohana arambewala, first of all i would like to thank you for expressing your views on this article. I would like to answer to certain questions pointed by you. With regards to the fact i accused the government, i havent mentioned anywhere in my article that the government is responsible for attack on MTV. You have attributed these attacks to JHU. Well since 2005 the JHU have been supporting the govt of president Rajapaksa and many of the JHU starlwarts are contesting the election from UPFA. So the government is indirectly responsible if the JHU is involved in an attack. The JHU have already denied their hand in this attack. My problem with the government is, why did they issued a visa to the leader of the Myanmar Junta who is responsible for many attrocities against buddhist monks and buddhists? and rejected a visa to Akon on grounds of blasphamy? If the government can reject Akon? Then why did they accept the Burma Leader? Why double standards? So I really didnt jump to accuse the Government nor I am misinformed of what I’m talking.

Shamed Lankan said,

March 28, 2010 @ 11:13 am

@wijayapala: I dpn’t have to govern Sri Lanka for it to be a backward Third World nation. You guys are doing a wonderful job of making it so. I hate to point it out to you, but you do live in a backward Third World nation and you always will. Sri Lanka is [the way it is] because of the likes of you. You may think otherwise, but no matter how much you [Edited out] try, you will never ever even be able to rise to be a mediocre country.

Human said,

March 28, 2010 @ 1:33 pm

@Shamed Lankan “but you do live in a backward Third World nation and you always will. Sri Lanka is [the way it is] because of the likes of you. You may think otherwise, but no matter how much you [Edited out] try, you will never ever even be able to rise to be a mediocre country.”

I’m opposed to the violence directed at Akon and all for him performing in Sri Lanka — but your comments are really offensive. Whatever Sri Lanka is I’d rather live there than anywhere else. If that’s living in a “backward Third World” nation then be it.

Heshan said,

March 28, 2010 @ 8:37 pm

SomeWhat Disgusted:

“I agree with you on the effect and couldn’t care less for Akon or his slimy undulations and it probably is a good thing that neither the fellow nor his vile act is coming to Sri Lanka”

But the funny thing is that with all the publicity generated by the Akon incident, more people in SL will probably end up watching his video online (if only due to sheer curiosity), than if it were the case that he simply came, gave his concert, and left. It reminds me of the censorship of tamilnet. Those who wanted to visit the site still found a way.

yapa said,

March 28, 2010 @ 8:45 pm

“If the government can reject Akon? Then why did they accept the Burma Leader? Why double standards? So I really didnt jump to accuse the Government nor I am misinformed of what I’m talking.”

Tis- A – Marvelous Argument.

These learned writers don’t understand the differences between these two persons.

Will you be treated and accepted equally as Mahinda Rajapaksha or Ranil Wickramasinghe anywhere in the world? Do you expect you to be treated so?

Tis- A-Marvelous world!

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 28, 2010 @ 9:15 pm

“As much as I love to hear how you consider yourselves to be guardians of ultimate truths, I sometimes do wonder why you don’t put your words into action, achieve Nirvana, and look at the rest of us deluded souls with some compassion? ”

I guessed some people would end their journey here.

Most of the anti- Buddhists want us to be tolerant for any bloody thing, to be in meditation until we are massacred, try to achieve Nirvana until they come and put their shit on our door steps. This is the kind of Buddhists they want.

Anti-Buddhists want Buddhist to behave the way they (anti-Buddhists) want. Please preach the people of your category:anti-Buddhists. We very well know how to react and behave according to the situation. (You must have heard of Contingency Theory)

(Above is a very crude and very popular argument among not much educated commons. People who have no creativity have to copy such arguments. Shame!)

Thanks!

Tis-a-small-world said,

March 28, 2010 @ 10:16 pm

Dear yapa, well with regards to akon and burma leader. Akon is a singer and burma leader is a leader of a country. Akon is a convicted robber, have been accused for his erotic behavior with underage girls and was accused of insulting buddha in his video. The burma leader is accused of mass scale atrocities against buddhists and buddhist monks. So in that way i dont see a difference between the two of them. And I’m brainy enough to understand the diferance between President Rajapaksa and Ranil Wickramasinghe. As i am an ordinary citizen, i dont expect myself to be treated like the m. But if the Goverment is so concerned about people defaming buddhism, then it should have rejected the visa for Burma leader for his record against buddhits in myanmar. Dear yapa as an ardent buddhist if you agree with the government’s decision to reject visa to akon, in the same way you should disagree with the govt for giving visa to burma leader. Although you have objected my views, i respect your views. Thanks for your involvement in constructive debate!

Sohan Fernando said,

March 29, 2010 @ 12:28 am

What’s truly terrible is this: it seems to me we have made statues more important than people and values?

I mean, the primary reason for the ban SHOULD have been the disgusting behavior (whether in action, words, or anything else) on many of his videos or performances, regardless of whether or not any of that took place in front of a statue.

Otherwise, in effect we are saying that we don’t mind and we will allow disgusting dehumanizing of women or anyone, or any other sexual or other immorality and bad values that he is accused of; but if any of this is in front of a religious icon then we will be up in arms so to speak. That’s rather absurd isn’t it?

What do we think the religious leaders depicted by any such statue, would say about such an attitude? The best and only way to respect God or one’s god or gods or religious leader, is not by respecting statues of him/them, but by respecting his/their teachings and values.

So why is it that the authorities who banned this, and some of the people who were against him, seem more upset about an alleged insult to a particular religion in an incident of 2 seconds, rather than being upset about a far more clear insult spanning many videos and performances, that is an insult to family values; an insult to morality; an insult to the reverence deserved by the Human Being and the human body?

Don’t misunderstand me, I am NOT saying it was alright to have such behavior in front of such a statue, IF it was in fact intentional. I am not saying that. I am just pointing out some priorities. Statues cannot ever be given the same amount of importance as people or moral values.

now going a little offtrack, there are immoral VIPs who are invited to all kinds of events, or even made the chief guest of such things. If Akon’s morals are in fact despicable so as to ban him from coming here (and from the little I’ve read, ignoring the statue incident, I might be inclined to agree with such a banning) then we are fools and hypocrites if we are so blind that we don’t see that we are inviting people far worse than Akon to our other events. Let’s get some consistency shall we? and first get our priorities straight.

wijayapala said,

March 29, 2010 @ 12:35 am

Dear SomewhatDisgusted,

In that regard, what is your opinion on the reaction of the “angered Buddhists”? The very term seems an oxymoron and I do wonder how these so-called Buddhists relate it to the system of beliefs they are trying to teach others and what the Buddha himself would have to say about their actions? I truly feel sad that the name of such a great individual is being used to justify irrational and bigoted reactions.

“Angry Buddhism” has been in SL for a long time. In fact, I can’t think of another Buddhist country outside SL where kings who used force to defend Buddhism were extolled in literature.

This “angry,” defensive mentality of the Sinhala Buddhist probably explains why Buddhism survived only in SL and nowhere else in South Asia, and why SL has the oldest continuing tradition of Buddhism in the world.

Heshan said,

March 29, 2010 @ 12:47 am

Mahinda Rajapakse is good friends with all of the anti-Buddhists.

What about the anti-Buddhist Chinese? What about the anti-Buddhist Burmese leader?

“On 27 September 2007, the military junta that has governed Myanmar for 60 years, ordered the repression of the monks, who were only seeking respect for human rights and greater democracy in the country: Monasteries were raided, monks were arrested, many were killed or forced into exile.

Ashin Issariya – one of the founders of the Alliance of All Burmese Monks (Abma) – reports: “The generals have not ceased to insult and punish monks and the Buddhist religion. More than 270 religious are still held for their alleged political activities”.

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/The-Burmese-junta-continues-the-persecution-of-Buddhist-monks-16968.html

———————————————

Here is Mahinda Rajapakse shaking hands with the Burmese leader:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_BKEsPchLV78/SvwEjM_T_YI/AAAAAAAABEY/Y3rsNRhyfGQ/s1600/mahinda_general_than_shwe.jpg

Here is Mahinda Rajapakse shaking hands with the Chinese leader:

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-08/08/xin_19208050806349532409917.jpg

What about this guy?

http://theblackcordelias.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/dalai-lama1.jpg

Why has Mahinda Rajapakse denied him a visa?

Colombo rejected visa to Dalai lama

http://www.lankanewspapers.com/news/2009/8/47253_space.html

ramona therese fernando said,

March 29, 2010 @ 1:24 am

Huge differences between the GOSL interacting with the Burmese government and The GOSL endorsing a visa for Akon. No double standards here as the two entities cannot be compared.

It is the right of the people of Sri Lanka to have a government which will interact with every other government in the world it feels it would server her people best. Sri Lanka can learn from Burmese socialist styles, and Burma can learn the way Sri Lanka conducts her democracy. Also the two countries can share Buddhism as their main religion and Burma can learn (and has learnt) from Sri Lanka, the organizational structure of the Maha Sanga, and their role to play within any society.

Akon, on the other hand, is an individual artist with no advantage towards Sri Lanka, her cultural scene or financial scene. Now if Akon was going to perform some kind of charitable work for the victims of the tsunami or veteran soldiers, or for the IDP’s, then apology from him and some kind of enrollment in Buddhism classes might be have been permissible. But if he is just there to entertain for the sake of a few rapping fans, and for the distinction of this world famous artist perform in Sri Lanka, then no amount of conversion and lessons on Buddhism will satisfy the poor common person who only wants to live a life of peace within the precepts of Buddhism.

I might add, though, that Akon’s song “Lonely” is very moving.

longus said,

March 29, 2010 @ 7:08 am

To devotee;There is no sermon or discourse by the Buddha in which he has recommended erection of statues in order to worship him.It can be taken as a later addition in order for the devotees to observe reverence in him,which is amply portrayed in the “Samaadhi Statue” in Anuradhapura.But it doesn’t mean the practice should be discontinued as the statue has become an integral part of the fabric of the Buddhist culture.

May be the symbol has overtaken the true message of Buddhism,but who are we to pass judgements on people’s beliefs?Do we have a right to ridicule the beliefs of people.Nobody has a right to insult.

To Yapa;Your last comment strikes the nail on the head.If you want to question a religion or a belief system their is a way of doing it.A scientific opinion of a belief with facts is always welcome in Buddhism.There are number of books written in this context.

I invite you to read the two books “The Greatest Show On Earth” and “God Delution” written by the famous writer Dorkins.

ramona therese fernando said,

March 29, 2010 @ 7:47 am

Huge differences between the GOSL interacting with the Burmese government and the GOSL endorsing a visa for Akon. No double standards here as the two entities cannot be compared.

It is the right of the people of Sri Lanka to have a government which will
interact with every other government in the world it feels it would serve her
people best. Sri Lanka can learn from Burmese socialist styles, and Burma can
learn the way Sri Lanka conducts her democracy. Also the two countries can shareBuddhism as their main religion and Burma can learn (and has learnt) from Sri Lanka, the organizational structure of the Maha Sanga, and their role to play within any society.

Akon, on the other hand, is an individual artist with no advantage towards Sri
Lanka, her cultural scene or financial scene. Now if Akon was going to perform
some kind of charitable work for the victims of the tsunami or veteran soldiers,
or for the IDP’s, then apology from him and some kind of enrollment in Buddhism classes might be have been permissible. But if he is just there to entertain for the sake of a few rapping fans, and for the distinction of this world famousartist perform in Sri Lanka, then no amount of conversion and lessons on Buddhism will satisfy the poor common person who only wants to live a life of
peace within the precepts of Buddhism.

I might add, though, that his song “Lonely” is very moving.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EEW-9NDM5k&feature=channel

Heshan said,

March 29, 2010 @ 8:15 am

Ramona Therese:

Yes, Sri Lanka has learned from Burmese socialist styles. The levels of repression and oppression parallel each other very closely indeed. If Sarath Fonseka had been elected President, we might have seen a military government in SL, such as one finds in Burma right now.

SomewhatDisgusted said,

March 29, 2010 @ 9:00 am

Dear Wijayapala,

This “angry,” defensive mentality of the Sinhala Buddhist probably explains why Buddhism survived only in SL and nowhere else in South Asia, and why SL has the oldest continuing tradition of Buddhism in the world.

In other words, a meme that is willing to kll, and which is in effect, no different from any other religion? So what good does this continuing tradition do its adherents if they are as violent and chauvinistic as the rest?

yapa said,

March 29, 2010 @ 9:04 am

Dear Sohan Fernando:

“The best and only way to respect God or one’s god or gods or religious leader, is not by respecting statues of him/them, but by respecting his/their teachings and values.”

If you don’t have the best go for the second best!

I think you know the value of “Freedom of Choice”. Isn’t this profound western principle applicable in this eastern scenario?

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 29, 2010 @ 9:35 am

Dear Tis-a-small-world

“But if the Goverment is so concerned about people defaming buddhism, then it should have rejected the visa for Burma leader for his record against buddhits in myanmar.”

These are two incomparable things. It is like comparing a coconut to an apple. You must understand the subtleties running behind these issues.

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 29, 2010 @ 10:24 am

Dear Sohan Fernando;

“Statues cannot ever be given the same amount of importance as people or moral values.”

Many people of today are so much used to this materialistic and consumerist worldview that they they see only the material value of every thing. They don’t see the underlying non material value attached to them.

A Buddha statue is no more a piece of clay after it is Transform into a Buddha statue. Buddhist don’t pay homage to a piece of lay, but pay a great respect to a Buddha statue, because they invariably identify the “Non-Material values attached/added. They have the very natural inherent intuition to identify them, which many of our learned people of today are lacking. They have no sense organs to identify such subtleties. A man is not just his physic. A man is a totality or a composition of physical, mental, moral, spiritual, social and political….etc. ,etc. components. People’s needs are a complex mixture of them. One cannot grossly say that physical needs are always more important than others. In some cases and instances others may become more important than physical needs. We go to temple, kovil, church or to mosque not because we get some material benefits.

You may know that our kings risked their lives to protect the sacred Tooth Relic and Pathra Dhatuwa (Begging bowl used by the Buddha). These sacred things were more valuable than their lives to them. They have understood the underlying values of these “material” things.

It is very easy to argue in favour of material values, because almost all can see and feel them: they are tangible. It is not that easy to see or feel these non material things. But it doesn’t mean they are non existent or unimportant. If anybody thinks so most of the time they are not capable to capture and understand such subtleties. I think post modern man of today was unable to identify these underlying values even under their sophisticated electronic microscopes. It is not the fault of the microscope but I think is of the viewer.
With the eyes blinded by the materialism they don’t see what is lying in the glass strips held under the microscope. I think this is a tragedy faced by the modern day “Homo_Sapien”.

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 29, 2010 @ 10:41 am

Dear longus;

Thanks for the information. I read about a half of “The Greatest Show On Earth”, I will try to read both. Thanks again!

The Secret Agent said,

March 29, 2010 @ 10:41 am

“Freedom of speech/expression, hullabaloo does not mean anybody can visit our country and display vulgar, outlandish, gross, barbaric performance to down grade our own cultural values” – Nihal Fernando

F’do, Do you have a young sis or a friend-girl? If so, ask her to dress-up quite normally (not like a sexy bitch!) and simply take the 5.10pm bus to Galle from the main Fort bus terminal – the one hat runs right down the southern Sinhala-Buddhist hearland. Ask her not to sit but remain standing through-out the journey and then get a report on her commuter experience?

How almost every male commuter makes good advantage of the jam-packed conditions of the local buses to do the perverted press-on on women much to their despair of the ladies – and how the vitims scramble to sit down at the first available seat. Public exposure of genitals (often by lifting their sarongs), public masturbation and similar displays are common behaviors by Sri Lankan men – and these perversions have been going on for decades, on a daily basis, without any actions by officials (they often are the worst offenders). Hardly ever are there such perverted behaviors among communters of public transposrtation in the US or in Europe. Your chracterization that “yes, abuses here and there occur in Sri Lanka” is a gross trivilization of the daily perverse behaviors of Sri Lankan men. And let’s not even get into the worst kinds of sexual perversions that occur at the famous Freshman ragging at Sri Lankan universities – a sicko form of induction for new comers unique only to Sri Lanka’s higher education system!! Bravo, purtitan Sinhalese-Buddhists!

I can write a book about the social perversions of Sri Lanka backed by photographs, and testimonials of victims compiled over many years by a supra state organization. Your attempt to project your society as holier-than-thou in comparison to the West/US’s open sexual expressions – only makes yours the most hypocritical in the world. Ask your sis or friend-girl who the real hypocrites are and stop exposing your sheer hypocritical nakedness.

Heshan said,

March 29, 2010 @ 12:07 pm

“and why SL has the oldest continuing tradition of Buddhism in the world.”

What is it that’s particularly stunning and glamorous about Sinhala-Buddhism that sets it apart from other forms of Buddhism? The Buddha himself never wrote anything. So this “tradition” regardless of how old it is can only consist of ideas that were passed down orally and at some point transcribed. Ideas which were mostly borrowed from Vedanta and modified extensively so that everyone from the village witch to the court jester could understand them. If you are really proud of a tradition of borrowed ideas, so be it. Each to his own!

Anvil said,

March 29, 2010 @ 1:11 pm

“our chracterization that “yes, abuses here and there occur in Sri Lanka” is a gross trivilization of the daily perverse behaviors of Sri Lankan men. ”

That’s right, keyword being SRI LANKAN men… what, you don’t think Sinhalese Christian men rape, eve tease, steal, lie, loot, kill or do anything depraved? You don’t think Sri Lankan Muslim men do any of that? You don’t think Tamil Hindu men do any of that? Look at what Catholic priests are up to in Negombo, Wattala and other parts of the country (and the rest of the world) and one just has to go hmmmm. Pointing fingers at just the Sinhalese Buddhists is not going to work….

aiyo said,

March 29, 2010 @ 1:13 pm

well said, secret agent!! akon coming to sunny lanka will have no impact on our daily travels in packed buses and trains….the indignities we, as women have to suffer, no matter what we wear (long skirts and shapeless blouses, even)…the perverts in this country will carry on, akon or no akon!
for the doubters, never mind the trains, take the 138 bus at rush hour!!
also how many music videos have been shot in brazil with christ the redeemer statue looking down on them???? lots. haven’t heard of protest there though, despite it being a mostly a christian country…

yapa said,

March 29, 2010 @ 1:20 pm

Dear The Secret Agent;

“How almost every male commuter makes good advantage of the jam-packed conditions …………………………………….sheer hypocritical nakedness.

May be all true and we have enough hooligans, still we don’t need any other outside hooligan/s to be imported to make it in excess of them or to make Sri Lanka a brothel house for foreign criminals.

Akon is a Cultural Hit Man! (Secret Agent?)

Let him live in his country with all sorts of criminal acts with 14 yr old girls or whoever it is and let us live the way we want in this troubled country. Why anybody wants to catch fish here? We are not going to catch fish by force in others’ territorial waters.

Sri Lanka is not a brothel house to entertain all sorts of bastard. It is welcome Sri Lanka safeguarding and holding its dignity high with a good back bone.

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 29, 2010 @ 1:47 pm

Dear Sohan Fernando;

“Statues cannot ever be given the same amount of importance as people or moral values.”

Why then modern people like give an enormous value and price for “Mona Lisa”, Isn’t that only a little bit of valueless paint on a piece of paper/cloth?

World is not flat to understand easily. It is a complicated ball most of the time stuck in the throats of many. It is not easy to swallow as we think! Even if we swallow it with difficulty, it is not easy to digest.

Thanks!

Thanks!

BalangodaMan said,

March 29, 2010 @ 2:27 pm

I agree with Secret Agent: Please someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I heard that in SL there is no concept of rape within marriage.

To Wijayapala,

If you do not see that the expression ‘angered Buddhist’ is an oxymoron either you do not understand what an oxymoron is, or you do not understand what ‘a Buddhist’ is.

I think SL’s problem is, we use a lot of internationally/commonly used words (like ‘Buddhism’) without really understanding what they mean – eg. democracy, freedom, freedom of expression etc. We pride ourselves that SL is a Buddhist country but ironically most Buddhists in SL do not understand what it is.

An ‘angered Buddhist’ is someone who thinks he/she is a Buddhist, who has failed to successfully apply and benefit from the teachings of Buddhism in their lives, or more probably never tried to apply the teachings, or never wanted to try to be a Buddhist. Such a person had Buddhism thrust upon him/her by an accident of birth, rather than through reasoned choice. An ‘angered Buddhist’ does more harm to the reputation of this great ancient philosophy than a 2 second film edit that the film editors were unaware of. Clearly the producers of the AKON video had no intention of insulting – if the location for the shoot was selected for the existence of the Buddha statute they would have shown more of it. The same cannot be said about you Wijayapala – you know, or ought to know what Buddhism is about, and your refusal to acknowledge the values of Buddhism is a lifetime’s intentional living insult to Buddhism – far more damaging than a 2 second unintentional edit by someone who could not have known.

Laughing Lankan said,

March 29, 2010 @ 6:09 pm

greetings everyone!!!

its’s amazing to see these comments!!! the ideology and thinking of some are…… what can i say seriously shows how screwed up our mindset is!!! after all this is just a song… if Akon’s sexy bitch song is the problem then are you going to ban it from being played in the radio stations?? or is this the very first song that has come out referring to a woman as bitch??!!

if you’re saying the reason for the ban is women in bikinis dancing in front of the statue of Lord Buddha then what about the souvenir with the tattooed picture of Lord Buddha on the bare back of a woman made available to tourists by the Ministry of Tourism????

and some are trying to bring in an ethnic issue into this as well… and the dude who says “hindus and muslims are brought up in strict religious backgournds”.. what bullshit is that?? seems like he hasn’t been to a night club in colombo…

cut the crap ppl… its not akon who has to be banned rather these stupid third grade ideologies we see amongst us!!!

The Secret Agent said,

March 30, 2010 @ 3:18 am

To Anvil: “Pointing fingers at just the Sinhalese Buddhists is not going to work….”

Nearly 100% of commuters of the 5:10 evening Fort-Galle bus are Sinhalese Buddhists puritans. Nonetheless, not only Tamil, Hindu and Muslim men but the world over there are perverts. My point is not so much about human frailties but about the sheer hypocrisy of Sinhalese Buddhists who perpetually try to project a holier-than-thou image to the world and yet behave in the most perverted of ways.

To Yapa: “May be all true and we have enough hooligans …”

So you think that every man who does the press-on is a hooligan and not a sexually repressed Sinhala-Buddhist man, huh? Go ask your sis, wife or girl-friend. And furthermore, you think that every univ. senior who demand that the freshmen do the “crotch-train” at ragging is also a hoologan? Perhaps you live not in Sri Lanka but in La-la land. Get real, my friend go in front of the mirror and accept your true Sinhala-Buddhist reality! [Go to the WHO site and look at the sad social statistics for Sri Lanka: infant motality; sexual abuse; rape; suicides; drug use; child prostitution; - and you will know the hell hole you and your leaders have created on the hellish-paradise.] On a more concilliatory note, kindly tryto be open minded and know that the West (and especially the US) are not what you guys think – yes, there’s lots of crap here, but by large these societies though primarily Jewish-Christian, the people are much more Buddhist-like than the Sinhalese-Buddhists of Sri Lanka. You guys are shouting from your rear-ends having never lived (for long times) and experienced these societies – I have for very many decades – lived both in the US and SL.

Best – and my apologies if hard feelings!

ivan said,

March 30, 2010 @ 9:50 am

Akon and Buddhism in Sri Lanka: A Monk’s Response

by Bhikkhu K. Tanchangya, The Buddhist Channel, Mac 28, 2010

Kandy, Sri Lanka — An article titled “Akon and Buddhism in Sri Lanka” under a pseudo name should not have been published in the Buddhistchannel, to say the least. Not only that the write-up is not coherent at all with the actual reasons why the Sri Lankan government was forced to deny a visa to someone called “Akon” but also the title itself is very outrageous.
The writer from Colombo who didn’t even have the guts to publish the write-up under his real name gave a pretty long discourse on “Buddhist Philosophy” in support of Akon and deplored the action of the SL government and the people of Sri Lanka as if Akon possesses all the virtues mentioned in his “Buddhist Philosophy” while the peoples who opposed don’t!
Yes, Lord Buddha did open the door of his sasana for everyone including “murderers, thieves (Akon is a convicted car thief!), prostitutes and the lower castes” but He also did not condone any such virtues as disrespect and indifference towards the sasana, a fact which the writer even does not know. Devadatta with his group of disciples and the group of seven monks who often showed disrespect and total disregard towards the sasana were deplored by the Buddha himself even to the extent that they were called “ignorant bugs and trouble makers destined for hell”.
Trying to justify someone’s disrespect and utter disregard for the sasana on the basis of twisted “Buddhist Philosophy” is nothing but lame. The importance of Buddhist Tolerance and Equanimity (upekkha) lies not in passive mode as such but in how one reacts to situations with Wisdom and Understanding (pañña). When some anti-Buddhist quarters manufacture biscuits in Lord Buddha’s figure and bikinis with Buddha’s images, when ignorant movie makers show the Lord Buddha’s statue under the most disrespectful and provocative places like bars, resorts and hotel rooms — how someone like Tis-a-small-world, who might not be a Buddhist him/herself, would advise the Buddhists to react and protest such activities???!!!
As responsible and practicing Buddhists, we cannot keep quiet in the name of Tolerance and Equanimity. Let us not show our stupidity to the world by asking – what is there in an image or statue?! If you can understand why Muslims and Christians protest at the slightest depiction of their religious leaders and scriptures in an unbecoming way, why can’t you understand why Sri Lankan Buddhists did what they did?!
The denial of visa to Akon was not merely on the basis of “a music video of the singer, containing a clip of scantily clad models dancing against the back drop of a Buddhist statue” as the writer has sweepingly stated. The Sri Lankan media has widely reported two facebook groups, one of which attracted more than 15,000 members within few days, opposing the proposed concert by Akon.
The members of these groups have distributed and widely publicize some information together with graphic photos and videos about Akon which do not fit into the Sri Lankan cultural setup. First of all, Akon is a convicted car thief. He has also generated a heated controversy in America and elsewhere for simulating a sex scene with and violently humping a 14 year-old girl on an open stage (Akon later downplayed the public outcry by saying he didn’t know that the girl was underage!). The singer has also come under fire for violently throwing a teenage boy off the stage into the crowd injuring some fans.
And secondly, his songs contain vulgar and culturally unpleasant lyrics as typical to all such R&B music. The objections therefore seem more of a cultural and moral nature that religious. Thirdly, the music video of the singer which generated protest from the Buddhist quarter was coinciding with his subsequent tour to Sri Lanka underlying the subtle message that the singer is above religion.
Now Akon’s denial that he was not aware about the statue being on his set when he shot the video was an outright lie, for he must have been blind for not seeing such a huge Buddha statue under which he shot his video with his scantily clad female dancers. Photo shots of the singer with the Buddha statue behind him, perhaps discussing the details of the scene, surrounded by the producers and dancers of the music video have emerged over the internet.
By consciously lying his ignorance about the Buddha statue being on his set, Akon was not only showing his further utter disregard for Buddhist feelings without apologizing but he was also systematically misrepresenting the religion to which he belongs when he said that he himself was a spiritual man. Akon can be worshipped by the sexualized West as a star but not in the East, at least not in Sri Lanka. Indeed, Akon further should feel himself lucky for being able to get away lightly from the rage of the Buddhists by his lie.
The organizers of the proposed concert at first tried to calm down the public protest by saying that they had prior support and permission from the Ministry of Tourism, a report which has later been rejected by the Ministry itself as a lie. In the midst of the crisis, some insensitive quarters even went onto air by saying that the music video in question was nothing at all because in the West Buddha statues are treated as mere decorations and ornaments!
Perhaps the peoples of the Buddhist world have been too tolerant and too compassionate for keeping silence over such display of the Lord Buddha as an object of mere decorations and beautifications of households and commercialized businesses!
The government of Sri Lanka certainly has other options to promote tourism in the country other than bringing down someone who has obviously insulted the country’s major religion and who obviously has no affinity to local culture and tradition. Those who have been debating for the concert as a major chance of promoting tourism in the country are utter nonsense. The task of promoting tourism in the country belongs to the ministry of tourism, not to some business minded people who are more worried about losing such a major opportunity of filling up their pockets than losing a tourism opportunity for the country.
The organizers of the concert have not given up their hope yet, so are the people who oppose it but the government should not take any step that would hurt the feelings of so many people who are deeply involved in the religion for which Akon has no feelings

niranjan said,

March 30, 2010 @ 11:44 am

Yapa,

“Let him live in his country with all sorts of criminal acts with 14 yr old girls or whoever it is and let us live the way we want in this troubled country.”- ” what is the “way we want” that you are talking of? or is it the way you want?
You have a right to your opinion as much as others have to theirs.

Anvil said,

March 30, 2010 @ 11:46 am

“Nearly 100% of commuters of the 5:10 evening Fort-Galle bus are Sinhalese Buddhists puritans.”

And how would you know that nearly 100% of the commuters of the 5:10 evening are “Sinhalese Buddhist puritans” ? Have you done a survey?

“My point is not so much about human frailties but about the sheer hypocrisy of Sinhalese Buddhists who perpetually try to project a holier-than-thou image to the world and yet behave in the most perverted of ways.”

No different to the Sinhalese Christians who think they are better than everyone else simply because they are Christian – but engage in child abuse, rape, the drug trade, murder, violence etc etc. Just look at what the Sinhala Catholic priests get up to in Negombo itself and you’ll see…talking about God/morality/allegedly superior christian culture but doing the most nasty, deprived things to other human beings

Anvil said,

March 30, 2010 @ 11:57 am

“So you think that every man who does the press-on is a hooligan and not a sexually repressed Sinhala-Buddhist man, huh? ”

They could just as likely be sexually repressed Sinhala Christians desperate for some contact with women, having been brought up in a puritan Christian family that puts worshipping Jesus Christ ahead of anything else. Or a sexually repressed Tamil Hindu man. Or a sexually repressed Tamil Christian man. Or a sexually repressed man. And as a point of interest, I have met lots of western Christians who are far, far better Christians than a lot of the rabid ignorant Sinhalese Christians that inhabit Sri Lanka. I think this cuts both ways and in different angles so it’s a not helpful to look at it through one prism.

niranjan said,

March 30, 2010 @ 1:03 pm

“The Poya day ban on serving liquor in tourist hotels though politically sensitive must be looked at with level heads. While good Buddhists will abstain from alcohol or flesh eating, those are maters of morality or private choice. It does not make sense to force them down the throats of people holding different views.”
“The recent Akon affair is another case in point. Most reasonable people will agree that the rap star, whom the majority of Lankans have not heard of was not deliberately seeking to denigrate Buddhism. But we in our wisdom have decided to deny him a visa to enter the country allowed some goons to throw stones at the ofices of MTV/Sirasa quite forgetting the role that the Tourist Board and Sri Lankan Airlines played in promoting the event.” Moderation must be the name of the game, Island Editorial, Sunday 28 March 2010.-

many thanks Manik and the Sunday Island for the well thought out, rational argument on the use of liquor on Poya days and the Akon affair that you have put forward in the Editorial from which I have quoted above.

rajivmw said,

March 30, 2010 @ 1:16 pm

Wiyajapala,

“This angry, defensive mentality of the Sinhala Buddhist probably explains why Buddhism survived only in SL and nowhere else in South Asia, and why SL has the oldest continuing tradition of Buddhism in the world.”

I take your point. It’s only thanks to my (mildly) angry father that I was not brought up to be a Christian like my mother.

The problem is that we seem to be left with a whole lot of anger and precious little Buddhism. I wonder if the former is now in fact the gravest threat to the latter.

BalangodaMan said,

March 30, 2010 @ 1:28 pm

To Ivan,

There is a BIG difference between Christianity/Islam and Buddhism.

Christians/Muslims’ religions are primarily based on devotion. Therefore, their reaction to desecration is consistent with their belief system.

Buddhism is not a devotional belief system. It primarily teaches cultivating detachment from the forces that make us have negative feelings (eg. anger).

Therefore, a Christian/Muslim who gets angry at their idols being desecrated is correctly behaving like a good Christian/Muslim.

A Buddhist who gets angry is demonstrating that he is a failed Buddhist.

The Buddhist establishment in SL, if true to Buddhist teachings, should use the AKON issue and the reaction to it as an opportunity to demonstrate to the 70% so-called Buddhists what Buddhism is and how it can benefit us, rather than write articles that misrepresent Buddhism for political gain.

Punitham said,

March 30, 2010 @ 1:46 pm

I know that some Buddhists are ashamed of some other Buddhists. True Buddhists even don’t say that they protect Buddhism.

The ‘some other Buddhists’ have been failing a simple test in Sri Lanka post-independence too conspicuously.

A faith is to live by and not to be used as a mere label.

Isn’t the 62-year slide down the slippery slope due to trying to worry about the label? Had it not been for the ‘some other Buddhists’ , most of the non-Buddhists may have voluntarily become Buddhists.

SomewhatDisgusted said,

March 30, 2010 @ 3:23 pm

Dear rajivmw,

“The problem is that we seem to be left with a whole lot of anger and precious little Buddhism. I wonder if the former is now in fact the gravest threat to the latter.”

As usual, you’ve expressed the key issue pithily. I fear that I’ve been quite strident in expressing my views but this is precisely the problem.

Dear BalangodaMan,

A Buddhist who gets angry is demonstrating that he is a failed Buddhist.

Exactly! What good is labeling oneself a Buddhist and insisting to the world that you are superior (as some have been doing here) when your actions convey the exact opposite idea? Is the goal to use Buddhism to live a good life? Or to label oneself a Buddhist and believe it for the sake of believing it

Can at least one of these individuals who harp on about the superiority of their belief demonstrate this superiority through their actions in some way? Perhaps by becoming an Arahat? Or at the very minimum, through words and actions which are worthy of emulation? If not, how is one to differentiate Buddhism from any other random, bigoted belief system?

ramona therese fernando said,

March 30, 2010 @ 6:50 pm

Dear Laughing Lankan,
The most purest and sustainable ideologies belong to the third-graders. When one is 7 years old, and at the age of reason, one is at an unadulterated stage of ideologies.

3rd graders see the world in their mommy, daddy, baby sibling who has to be looked after by them, older siblings they have to look up to, grandparents who are revered, aunties and uncles who entertainband that mommy and daddy love each other(an anything else an aberration to their well-being).

Indeed 7-year olds are at the peak of human involvement in the sustainable universe. Thrid graders see Life in all of its Noble Truths: from the distinction of Human Life right to the Divinity of Nibbana.

They are of an instinctive knowledge that Human life, being the greatest of all life, will propel one into eternal bliss. 3rd-graders wish all life forms were as happy as they are, and in that wish they propel other forms of life(in the earthly and heavenly realms) into the human world; the life-form that is most enabled to attain the eternal bliss of Arahanthood.

yapa said,

March 30, 2010 @ 7:38 pm

“what is the “way we want” that you are talking of? or is it the way you want?”

It is not the way I or you want BUT the way WE want. I am talking about COMMON GOOD not INDIVIDUAL GOOD!

I think you are aware of it.

Thanks!

ramona therese fernando said,

March 30, 2010 @ 8:13 pm

And government in different lands has different ideologies- that is their right as democracies and civilized entities.

Now Western governments work on different concepts compared to Eastern ones. For example The US has great freedoms which they induced onto her citizens for the sake of assimilating so many different tribes of the earth (and thus in bringing in to their nation the world’s wealth). UK and places had to also have all these freedoms as this is the way they had to recover after their global colonizations – how else were they to understand and sustain their place on the world stage if they didn’t give in to all other cultural entities?

Unfortunately only the odder ones thrive in the West, and the dignified ones remain in their own lands, or if they do go to the west, provoke some discomfit to the common man of these lands.

“Are these dark skins trying show us that they are somehow more cultured and civilized than we are?” it is queried in implausible astonishment. “Oh no,” it is concluded, “Akron is more correct to what we believe dark races and their religions should act like.”

Now with our long 3,000 year old history, ideologies are then therefore quite different, and the government is right is safeguarding the dignity of her native religions for the better of the majority of her citizens.

BalangodaMan said,

March 30, 2010 @ 8:19 pm

re. failed Buddhists – academic research

Why doesn’t the academic and scientific establishment in SL conduct academic research/survey to test the extent to which the various religious groups and secular people actually are in their adherence to the faith they swear by? For example, the subjects can be shown items and their reaction can be measured. The results will I think be extremely valuable for shaping the future of our country, no?

Sujewa Ekanayake said,

March 30, 2010 @ 10:07 pm

Ramona t. f.,

Re:

“Unfortunately only the odder ones thrive in the West, and the dignified ones remain in their own lands, or if they do go to the west, provoke some discomfit to the common man of these lands.”

I’ve met thousands of foreigners/immigrants in the US who are not odd at all & relatively great models for “good humans” – from what I can tell. Either you’ve had extremely bad luck with immigrants in the West or perhaps you have not traveled or lived in the West – or at least the US – that much.

Also, virtually everone in the US is a relative/offspring (great-great grandchild, etc.) of an immigrant or an immigrant – since the entire country (aside from Native Americans who were here when the country was started) is a result of immigration.

Also, re: the post prior, re” “eternal bliss of Arahanthood, 7 year olds, etc…”, the eternal bliss of arahanthood may be a myth. With Buddhism running the show in Sri Lanka for thousands of years, shouldn’t the island be full of blissful arahants by now? Does not seem to be the case.

A related question would be – is blissful arahanthood enough for a nation? Would that provide for food, shelter, health care, defense, competetive & useful education, meaningful & rewarding living, for millions of people? Well, we don’t know, because SL has failed to prove that – except for the monks, Buddhism is not capable of ensuring a good life (on earth) for millions of people (also, I do not count Burma or the Khemere Rouge/Cambodia or any of the other Buddhist countries at this point or in the recent past as being able to provide a good life for the majority of their citizens – even their favored citizen – the politically & religiously favored majorities). One exception may be Japan. Japan was able to achieve their success due to incorporating positive & useful elements of the West into their own country – as far as I can tell. I think the best way to ensure both the survival of Buddhism in a country & general development in other areas is to separate Buddhism from the government, allow secular life to grow, so that entrepenuers & educators & military & all other areas of regular/non-religious life are able to develop new solutions to current problems – pull in good ideas from rest of the world – w/ out Buddhism or a Buddhist Gov getting in the way (granted, this is now not related to the Akon issue, but how that was handled shows the current general approach to anything “foreign” from SL gov/propelled by Buddhists).

As far as I can see, there are no theocratic nations that people from around the world are excited about moving to, that are providing well for themselves & are a good example for the rest of the world. Reason being, I think, the current major religions – all initially conceived over a thousand years ago, are unable to compete well with the combination of freedom of thought & democracy & capitalism – all new inventions (in their current form, post-establishment of US).

(gotta go to work, will check back on this comments section later this week)

- S

BalangodaMan said,

March 30, 2010 @ 11:45 pm

Ownership of Buddhism: Another thought. This AKON matter arises from the delusion that somehow SL owns Buddhism and it’s ideals (even though it came from a foreign country).

However, let’s for a moment accept the status quo – ie. that most of the people are offended when people in other cultures regard Buddhist symbols in a different context (in the West the Buddha statue symbolised peace and tranquillity, hence a fixture by the pool in this video) and wish to ban their use. Here’s an analogy: Supposing there is a country somewhere where the people have been conditioned from childhood to revere the left hand (yes, the left hand. perhaps their god is left handed, or his messiah was – for the purpose of this analogy). The left hand is sacred to them. So, for example, they shake hands with their left hand. They wave with their left hand to indicate goodwill and friendship. Wouldn’t these people be hugely offended when they know that in SL many people wash their bottoms with their left hand?

What if they want to ban bottom washing in SL as our practice is an insult to their beliefs?

devotee said,

March 31, 2010 @ 12:01 am

I like to see the useful comments rather than blatant abuse of words in this forum I like to see constructive criticism of the policies.
I like the comments of Yapa on the value of teachings of Buddha than his statue. black sheeps are there in every community. I as a non-Buddhist often appreciated some of the good characters. I do not know whether they originated from the culture or religion.
it is very obvious that cultural is eroded immensely due to multiple factors example lack of spirituality, corrupted mass media as in this case of songs by scantily clad ladies and third class subcontinent films, drama and culture incompatible dances and so forth, we see the effects of them in day to day life, teen agers fighting each other, teachers, father molesting the students and daughters ransoms, abductions and taking revenge etc..lack of law enforcement and injustices are other area concerned politicians are too busy with elections than allocating time for services. I can barely see any one doing that today.

ramona therese fernando said,

March 31, 2010 @ 3:49 am

I’ve been living in the West, especially the US for a goodly number of years, sir, :) joined the common person in the West and have been made aware of their intents, purposes and interests.

They would prefer, it seems sir, that their culture, religion and ethnicity be preserved. And as immigrants they get together into their own ethnic groups and preserve their own identities. Oh, they do strive diligently to do what their government preaches, for in it, they are made aware of more affluent lifestyles. But thus far, and no further, it is for them. “It is our personal prerogative who we choose to join, and that is our inalienable right,” they say.

The big cities have a good amalgamation of races , but Jerry Springer and others make perverse play on the amalgamations of thus mingled thoughts and cultures (and poverty also).

I believe Sri Lanka does have a huge number of Arahants, but since of 1505, when the Portuguese first set foot in Sri Lanka, the numbers have dwindled . Sir Lanka will be soon providing decent lifestyles to her citizens. Unfortunately it took 60 years since independence for that (they were getting over the after-effects of colonial rule, but now stand a good chance).

They are living good decent, simple Buddhistic lives in Burma, and Cambodia would be too, if not for American interference. And Japan assimilated into the West after the ignominy of their terrible war. Oh yes, they learned the Western systems very fast. How long the West systems will be able to be sustained, I ask? Even at this time, Obama is moving towards a more socialistic form of government. Very correct too, and that is what the common man of America and the rest of the “common”globe desires.

As for the 7-years olds…….. we have to look to the beautiful and divine ideologies on the faces of our children, and then greater understanding will descend.

Sri Lanka is no theocratic nation, but the majority of her citizens prefer to live within the precepts of their religious beliefs.

And for this common man of Sri Lanka, so enamored of their religious beliefs, they are the backbone of the Nation. For it is through their hard work that comes the greater part of the Nation’s GDP.

wijayapala said,

March 31, 2010 @ 6:20 am

rajivmw & SomewhatDisgusted,

I neglected to mention a key point that the anti-Akon violence was NOT a spontaneous event orchestrated by ordinary Buddhists. It was very clearly motivated by political elements hostile to Sirasa TV (i.e. Mervyn Silva). That Akon’s music video included a 2-second shot of the Buddha was only the pretext for the perpetrators to justify what they did.

yapa said,

March 31, 2010 @ 6:20 am

Correction…..

It is not Kalana Senevirathna and sholud be Kalana Senaratne who wrote the article
“Aroused by Akon’s Sexy Bitch: the Rise of Sinhala-Buddhist Fundamentalism?”

Thanks!

wijayapala said,

March 31, 2010 @ 6:24 am

Dear Balangoda Man,

Therefore, a Christian/Muslim who gets angry at their idols being desecrated is correctly behaving like a good Christian/Muslim.
“A Buddhist who gets angry is demonstrating that he is a failed Buddhist.

Implicit in your above statement is that Buddhist doctrine preaches greater tolerance and aversion to anger than Christianity or Islam; by modern ethic standards it is the superior belief system.

Be that as it may, the world revolves around what is real and not what is merely doctrine. If Buddhists historically did not get “angry” when their faith was threatened, there probably would be no Buddhism today. I think we would much rather be “failed Buddhists” than not Buddhists at all, although I can definitely only speak for myself.

wijayapala said,

March 31, 2010 @ 6:26 am

The results will I think be extremely valuable for shaping the future of our country, no?

How so?

Atheist said,

March 31, 2010 @ 6:31 am

Dear Secret Agent,

Pssst, let me fill you in on a secret:

I agree with you that Sri-Lankan women/girls/children face sexual harassment on public transportation. I, for one, have never travelled on a bus/train that is filled with 100% Sinhala Buddhist ridership. Even in Sri-Lanka, I’ve always lived in multi-ethnic communities, except when I lived in Jaffna. Going back to the multi-ethnic setting in which I grew up, I know that every woman/girl/child faced some sort of sexual harassment while going about town. So, in that context, none of us were able to point out the ethnicity/religion of the perverts involved.

Since you care so much about women’s rights, I think you should stand up for women in Judeo-Christian societies as well. For example, I am sure you know about the 1989 Montreal massacre in which fourteen women were murdered on campus by a misogynist who blamed his failures on feminists. Though feminism has brought women much emancipation from male domination, there is still inequality in the workplace and in society. Unfortunately, sexual harassment and misogynistic violence is still a reality in the West.

By the way, secret agent, I am just as repelled by racism as I am by misogyny. Aren’t you? In my observation, the two go hand in hand.

wijayapala said,

March 31, 2010 @ 7:06 am

Punitham,

Had it not been for the ’some other Buddhists’ , most of the non-Buddhists may have voluntarily become Buddhists.

Or, had it not been for the ‘some other Buddhists,’ most of the Buddhists may have involuntarily become non-Buddhists.

Malinda Seneviratne said,

March 31, 2010 @ 7:39 am

Here’s a question:

Does anyone know of a single Christian (OF ANY DENOMINATION) who publicly protested (IN ANY FORM) the banning of the films ‘The Last Temptation of Christ’ and ‘The Da Vinci Code’?

Thank you, in advance.

Malinda

yapa said,

March 31, 2010 @ 7:49 am

The cause for all this hatred running through this web really is not Akon or denial of visa to him. This happened due to the irresponsible writing of Kalana Senevirathna and tis-a-small-world.

Thanks!

(This should have been posted before my last post: Correction…..)

SomewhatDisgusted said,

March 31, 2010 @ 8:12 am

Dear Malinda,

“Does anyone know of a single Christian (OF ANY DENOMINATION) who publicly protested (IN ANY FORM)…”

Are the Christians the role models for the Buddhists?

Sujewa Ekanayake said,

March 31, 2010 @ 10:09 am

Hey Ramona,

We definitely live in too different Americas, & perhaps even two different worlds (or our perceptions of the world have been shaped by two radically different sets of filters), check below:

Re:

“I’ve been living in the West, especially the US for a goodly number of years, sir, joined the common person in the West and have been made aware of their intents, purposes and interests.”

There is no one “common person” in the US, & thus there is no one intent, purpose or interest there, you’d have to clarify as to what all that means or what you think it means.

“They would prefer, it seems sir, that their culture, religion and ethnicity be preserved.”

There is no one culture, religion, or ethnicity to be perserved anywhere – specially not in the US (except maybe items directly related to the Constitution – but that’s more of a well definited organizatonal document than a culture/guideline for culture). Out of those two items – culture & religion are temoporary things, by-products of living. There is no eternal cutlure of religion, & thus those items are impossible to preserve – ask the Ancient Syrians, Ancient Egyptians, Ancient Zoroastrians/Persians, Ancient Romans, etc., etc. – if by some magical situation you get the chance. Re: ethnicity – that’s a delusion – much like race. People obsessing over trivial matters such as a language or a religion (both human inventions from a certain period of time), or something even more trivial like skin color & the few people who want to rule the rest using these “differences” as organizational items to control the rest, help make it easier to make war, etc.

And I could continue w/ responses to the rest of your post, but, they would be similar to above – we definitely see the world very differently. So I think I’ll just leave things there. I am sure both of us mean well (well, at least I am sure I mean well :) .

- S

Sujewa Ekanayake said,

March 31, 2010 @ 10:13 am

corrections:

“culture & religion are temoporary things, by-products of living. There is no eternal cutlure of religion”

should read:

culture & religion are temporary things, by-products of living. There is no eternal culture OR religion

yapa said,

March 31, 2010 @ 11:23 am

Dear Sujewa Ekanayake;

Can you please point out some eternal things for the benefit of humble and ignorant frogs like us who haven’t been outside this eastern well since our birth.

Thanks!

tis-a-small-world said,

March 31, 2010 @ 11:58 am

Dear Yapa,
“The cause for all this hatred running through this web really is not Akon or denial of visa to him. This happened due to the irresponsible writing of Kalana Senevirathna and tis-a-small-world.”
I completely disagree with you regarding that. The cause for all this hatred running through this web is the “intolerance and ignorance” of certain readers like “You” who have repeatedly blasted commentators of my article for expressing their opinion. Your failure to respect other’s views cannot be justified by accusing Me or Kalana Senaratna for producing our articles.
Mr.Yapa, you must also remember that the Article 10 of the Constitution gives both me and Kalana Senaratna the “Right to freedom of Thought and Religion” as well as “The right to Freedom of Speech, Expression and Publication” Article 14(1)(a).
Thanks!

tis-a-small-world said,

March 31, 2010 @ 12:15 pm

Dear Malinda Seneviratna,
Christians Not Protesting the Ban on “Da vinci code” is their problem. if they did not want to protest for the Ban, it’s their choice and as a person who respects the beliefs of other religions, I respect their stand.
You must remember that Buddhists are allowed to question their beliefs and what is taught, as well as point out mistakes. Lord Buddha has clearly mentioned in the Kalama Sutra. For more information please refer to, page 3 of “Budhun Wadala Dharmaya” by venerable Walpola Rahula. When a young samanera pointed, Arahath Sariyuth that his robe was touching the ground, Arahath Sariyuth excepted this and appreciated the young samanera for informing him. This is just a simple example taken from the Buddhist Literature. Therefore Buddhists are allowed to ask questions regarding what’s being taught as well as to point out mistakes. According to what I know other religions do not provide for their followers to question or point out mistakes. Thats where the greatness of Buddhism and the Lord Buddha lie.
Based on this liberty, we raise our voices when “the principles” of our noble philosophy “Buddhist Philosophy” is being challenged. One reason that the Government denied a visa to Akon is because he “insulted buddhism with his video. But the Government granted visa to the leader of Burma Than Shwe whose responsible for mass scale atrocities against Buddhists and Buddhist Monks. In my view the Than Shwe has done more damage to Buddhists than Akon. By granting visa to Than Shwe and denying visa to Akon we have challenged the principles of Buddhism and Lord Buddha.
I wish to thank you for taking your time to read my article and comment on it as a veteran writer and a journalist!

yapa said,

March 31, 2010 @ 1:45 pm

Dear tis-a-small-world;

Law is your only guide line?You don’t care about morality, ethics, virtues, customs, traditions etc…etc…? You have no belief/heed about ethical or moral conduct?

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 31, 2010 @ 2:01 pm

Dear tis-a-small-world;

Say for instance that issuing of visa to Than Shwe is wrong. Just because this do you think government doing the same wrong for the second time is right? If the government does the correct thing at least at the second time, shouldn’t it be appreciated?

That is how I understand with my little brains and little education.

Thanks!

yapa said,

March 31, 2010 @ 2:36 pm

Dear tis-a-small-world;

I have some comments about your reference to Kalama Sutta and Rahula Samanera incident. I will have no internet facilities for a couple of days from now on. Give me a few days. However, there is a small belief among Sinhala Buddhist Villagers that if a serpent is caught from the wrong end, it bites. also they say Dhamma also is same, and pave way to destruction.

Thank you for giving an opportunity to discuss Kalama Sutta, which gives profound guide lines for decision making, to distinguish right from wrong and good from bad. The readers will be able to see a marvelous epistemological experience.

Thanks again for giving the opportunity, will meet in a couple of days.

SomewhatDisgusted said,

March 31, 2010 @ 5:42 pm

Dear Wijayapala,

“Implicit in your above statement is that Buddhist doctrine preaches greater tolerance and aversion to anger than Christianity or Islam; by modern ethic standards it is the superior belief system.”

A quote by H.L. Mencken seems appropriate here: “We must respect the other fellow’s religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart. ” :-)

Frankly, I feel that by modern day standards, or at least as far as science goes, blind “belief” systems in general are obsolete.

” I think we would much rather be “failed Buddhists” than not Buddhists at all, although I can definitely only speak for myself.”

Fair enough. As long as one’s belief is kept to oneself and not foisted upon others, that’s decent. It’s when that boundary is crossed that problems start.

I will also grant that compared to other religions, Buddhism is a far more palatable religion to many because it’s seen as a gentle, peaceful and harmless religion. However, that is precisely what seems to be coming into question in Sri Lanka.

Also, why compare the barbaric past where the British invaded Sri Lanka with a bible in one hand and a gun in the other. Those days are long past. Concepts such as freedom of religion have taken root. Shouldn’t the “Angry Buddhist” adjust accordingly?

As to whether it’s better to be a failed Buddhist. I don’t mean to be harsh, but I feel most Buddhists are failures by default because they fail to be self-critical. Instead, they accept their own doctrine as the holy, indisputable truth while snickering at others for their own blind beliefs. A good point to start critically evaluating Buddhism, before professing superiority, would be to actually read the arguments *against* Buddhism. The problems are legion. (Although perhaps less so than for the Abrahamic ones. They indisputably take the crown for self-contradiction)

Sujewa Ekanayake said,

March 31, 2010 @ 9:02 pm

Hey Yapa,

(it’s a busy work day so i’ll try to keep this quick)

Re:

“Can you please point out some eternal things for the benefit of humble and ignorant frogs like us who haven’t been outside this eastern well since our birth.”

I don’t see anything significant – at least not cultural, or highly developed human inventions – that can be called eternal. Even aspects of the universe – the earth, the sun, etc. are believed to one day come to an end. But that could be billions of years from now – so, on the human scale – nothing significant/advanced/human made seems eternal. Or, going lower (time wise) than that, even w/ in one human lifetime (let’s say less than 100 years) much change happens. So, what’s a good way to deal with conflicts that arise when a person has to deal with ideas coming out of an older civilization comes into conflict with ideas that come out of a new civilization (i think this is one of the questions at the core of a lot of discussions here – eastern vs. “western” ways of doing things, what path is best, etc.) – i think the best way to go is to see what elements from both places can work well at a given moment for solving a given problem (also may be a good idea to keep track of even currently useless elements from each civilization in case they become useful later). Without blind attachment to one set of ideas just because they come from the land that you were born in, or the land that you live in, or, as probably the buddha said – ’cause a teacher tells you that they are important :) . Anyway, impermanance & temporary-ness of things needs to be taken into account & also the fact that all human inventions are human inventions, thus a part of the heritage of all humans, whether they believe that they are a part of a special tribe at war with the rest of the humans or not.

Also, two items that you may find interesting/possibly positve:

There’s a new documentary about the buddha airing on PBS later this month in the US. They’ll have a DVD of it for sale on Amazon, etc.

Just saw a positive article about recent changes in Jaffna on Time.com.

And, do you know much about Lokayata philosophy (our discussion about eastern vs. western philosophy & research related to it turned up lokayata)? There isn’t much available on the web about it. Apparently it was an ancient Indian school of philosophy that predates “modern” Hinduism, also perhaps one of the extremes that Buddhism refers to. Seems like it was a completely atheistic & maybe rational (by our current standards) philosophy that perhaps predates the Greeks & their use of such ideas. Anyway, figured you might have heard something about it in the SL – in Sinhala or Pali or Tamil references/from such sources. Let me know if you know anything or where to find out more about it. Thanks.

- S

ordinary lankan said,

March 31, 2010 @ 10:09 pm

I was listening to Ajahn Brahmawanso last night – pl visit the Buddhist society of Western Australia website – and he said something very much in point -

he said religion is not about who is right and who is wrong – it is about peace – and it is difficult to have peace when you get involved in all kinds of arguments – especially if they are not essential and not very useful and only cause irritation and pain of mind – in these cases it is much better to remain silent –

peace he said is really about honesty – knowing deep down how imperfect and human we are – and being willing to allow and help others learn their own lessons in their own time – you cannot really get another person to adopt your point of view – he will do it if he is ready – not otherwise.

armed with this peace you can go on to develop great reserves of patience, tolerance skill and understanding and wisdom. you can then use words with great care, great love and great effect ….

so we should not forget what is true religion when debating about a ‘religious-social – cultural’ issue

Burning_Issue said,

April 1, 2010 @ 12:23 am

Dear Wijayapala,

I have seen your posts to me; unfortunately, I am tied up with work at the moment. I will certainly write to you as to why Sri Lanka will never achieve its full potential without a common Sri Lankan identity. the concepts of a common Sri Lankan identity and Sinhala Buddhist owning Sri Lanka are mutually exclusive.

Yes, Minorities are somewhat subjugated at present; there is no doubt about that. The Tamils are being compelled to conduct there state businesses in Sinhala Language even in places like Jaffna. This was the case in the 70s; policemen taking statements in Sinhala, and people had to endorse them without even comprehending them! The government is making development plans for the North & East without involving the Tamils or Muslims. Basically, One is better off being a Sinhala Buddhist in Sri Lanka than belonging to a minority group.

BalangodaMan said,

April 1, 2010 @ 3:09 am

To Wijayapala,

“rather be “failed Buddhists” than not Buddhists at all,”

A failed Buddhist is not a Buddhist! You do not become a Buddhist just because your parents are Buddhists though such an erroneous convention is customary in SL. Buddhists all over the world are appalled by these ‘anger